Estes Space X Falcon 9 advertisement w/price

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
in case any of you are wondering how Estes is using all of our fun money, like all the found do-ray-me from the misery box sale, well, rest easy. found this video on their amazon store page. they spared no expense on this one.

https://m.media-amazon.com/images/S/al-na-9d5791cf-3faf/dd995be0-376a-444d-a6d0-3871b84e6502.mp4
Interesting that they stuff a "T" motor into an Alpha III. Or that they show the "T" motor next to, and at the same size, as regular 18mm motors. I think real rocket people didn't have enough input into this film.

Hans.
 
Technically they insert the motor the wrong way in that video... but nevermind.
At $150, I could probably buy all the bits needed to build a bigger, better 24mm at least Falcon 9.
At $150, I could buy a really nice LOC Precision kit that would last longer and I could stuff F and G motors into.

I mean, it's nice and all, but as someone who builds rockets to actually *fly* them, I'm investing my funds elsewhere.
 
The reviewer gave an overview - diameter 1.44”, length with fin unit 26.75”, weight 4.5 oz, removable for flight engine details, display stand, SpaceX style box with fitted foam, Dragon capsule and folded landing legs with nicely molded color details. He, unfortunately, hasn’t been able to launch his model but did recount the launches done at NARAM and confirmed stable flights on an Estes C5-3. The only hitches he relayed were needing to open up the center hole in the engine detail plate for the display stand rod and that the fin unit popped off on landing during some of the NARAM demo launches.

Again, I have little personal interest in this model - or any Falcon 9 model, I just don’t find it visually interesting - but it certainly fits nicely in the reviewer’s picture of his Falcon displayed with an array of 1:100 manned rocket models.

I think Estes is going to sell a bunch of these to their intended market of SpaceX fans, aerospace professionals and casual buyers of “cool stuff” - it’s really not aimed at hobby rocketry enthusiasts who like to build their own rockets.
So to summarize... a rocket kit that only Estes is selling and won't let anyone else sell that flies on engines that only Estes is selling and won't let anyone else sell.
 
So to summarize... a rocket kit that only Estes is selling and won't let anyone else sell that flies on engines that only Estes is selling and won't let anyone else sell.
?? I've gotten my C5-3s from AC Supply.

added: though if I were to buy one of these things to fly (not terribly likely) it would get a C12-4FJ or maybe even a C18-4W instead. The C18 would have the right "look"
 
?? I've gotten my C5-3s from AC Supply.

added: though if I were to buy one of these things to fly (not terribly likely) it would get a C12-4FJ or maybe even a C18-4W instead. The C18 would have the right "look"
Would an 18mm Aerotech RMS case fit it? You could at least get full D impulse that way.
 
Would an 18mm Aerotech RMS case fit it? You could at least get full D impulse that way.
No idea, but I suspect that the thrust ring on the back of the case would complicate things unless the Falcon-9 uses a different sort of motor retention than the 1/200 RTF Saturn V. That model has a screw-on retainer (which also retains the clear plastic fin unit) and it won't fit over the rear closure of an 18/20 case.
 
?? I've gotten my C5-3s from AC Supply.

added: though if I were to buy one of these things to fly (not terribly likely) it would get a C12-4FJ or maybe even a C18-4W instead. The C18 would have the right "look"
I've seen too many wonky C18 and D20 and C12 flights with weirdly gummed up nozzles or long/short delays to trust them in a $150 model, that also goes for any of their BP motors, I'd only use 18mm reloads personally.
 
I've seen too many wonky C18 and D20 and C12 flights with weirdly gummed up nozzles or long/short delays to trust them in a $150 model, that also goes for any of their BP motors, I'd only use 18mm reloads personally.
An 18 mm AT RMS case is super hot after a flight. I wouldn't trust them in a plastic motor mount.

That model has a screw-on retainer (which also retains the clear plastic fin unit) and it won't fit over the rear closure of an 18/20 case.

I just tried it with an unloaded case. The retainer will fit but cinching the cap down with fat fingers in between the clear fins is a challenge in delicacy. 😁
 
No idea, but I suspect that the thrust ring on the back of the case would complicate things unless the Falcon-9 uses a different sort of motor retention than the 1/200 RTF Saturn V. That model has a screw-on retainer (which also retains the clear plastic fin unit) and it won't fit over the rear closure of an 18/20 case.
kuririn beat me to it - from the instructions it looks like using any motor with an aft thrust ring could be an issue.
 

Attachments

  • 9A37A02A-4E80-4EBD-8630-8829B6E2B548.jpeg
    9A37A02A-4E80-4EBD-8630-8829B6E2B548.jpeg
    1.3 MB · Views: 1
Are you all preferred customers or what? I can't find a blasted thing about it on Estes's website. Even with a search or three.

Edited to add: Okay, get this. I went directly to Estes's site, looked in all the places I thought it would be listed, then searched 3 times. Nada. Then I just searched internet-wide from my browser and viola! The listing on the Estes site. :rolleyes::rabbitdontknow:
 
Last edited:
kuririn beat me to it - from the instructions it looks like using any motor with an aft thrust ring could be an issue.
Ah, looks like it's a rotate to lock fin unit with a retaining flange. Different from the 1/200 Sat. V.
Interesting that the fin unit is the motor retainer. Quite a bit different than the 1/200 Saturn V. I admit that I hadn't actually tried an 18/20 case in my SV....but now it looks like it's moot.
I've seen too many wonky C18 and D20 and C12 flights with weirdly gummed up nozzles or long/short delays to trust them in a $150 model, that also goes for any of their BP motors, I'd only use 18mm reloads personally.
The more recent production (the last year or so) of Q-Jets have been much more consistent with delay accuracy. I've flown a bunch of Q-Jets (probably well over 100 by now) and only have seen the nozzle issues once or twice. But I'd probably think about it a bit, especially with the White Lightning ones, since they have been a little more erratic for me.

Are you all preferred customers or what? I can't find a blasted thing about it on Estes's website. Even with a search or three.

Edited to add: Okay, get this. I went directly to Estes's site, looked in all the places I thought it would be listed, then searched 3 times. Nada. Then I just searched internet-wide from my browser and viola! The listing on the Estes site. :rolleyes::rabbitdontknow:
I got an email from Estes about it today, saying that since I'd signed up for "Rocket Rewards" I get first dibs.....
 
Are you all preferred customers or what? I can't find a blasted thing about it on Estes's website. Even with a search or three.
Go to the Estes homepage, scroll to the bottom and sign up for Rocket rewards. Members get early announcements and first dibs on sales and new products. Finally got my email and link to the Falcon 9 page but I'm gonna have to pass.
 
just a guess, but i think Estes farms out their visual stuff, including web, print and multi-media. folks doing the work don't really understand all the details. That would explain why a recent sale listed the m104 pat but showed the citation pat, and stuff like backwards engines in presentation material or whatnot. i could be wrong, of course. could be amanda, who has packaged my orders a couple times... or maybe summer...
 
Thanks for the comments and info,folks. Looks like I'll pass this one. I would have been interested 10 years ago.

Anywasy, I already expended my entire store of irony and wry wit buying the RTF SLS model. It's actually very nice and flies well.
 
Just saw it on the estes.com site. They say "The Space X Falcon 9 is the world’s first human-rated, reusable launch vehicle."

I guess the Space Shuttle doesn't count? I understand the Falcon 9 might be "more" reusable than the Shuttle, but we're splitting hairs, aren't we?

Or maybe there's some term-of-art in the space industry I'm not aware of...
 
This price makes little sense for a flying model, but it might be a nice static display, if you are into that sort of thing.
 
I have a fair amount of SpaceX memorabilia, so maybe I’m the kind of guy this is aimed at. Plus, a Lego Saturn V sits on my desk, as well as a flown model of the previous Estes Falcon 9, along with several other display models in my home office. So I'm already predisposed to display kits.

The model is also available via the SpaceX store so I had my son order one for me. I checked their public store and shipping is only $15, so maybe worth checking out if you are interested. Plus you can order all kinds of other cool swag.

Personally, I think it's a good sign that Estes is willing to invest the amount of money that is required for the molds and artwork for a kit of this detail. Based on other posts I've read about the Goex purchase and other business decisions, it seems as though current owners are trying very hard to grow the business in a variety of ways. And as has been pointed out in some of those threads, it is harder in many areas to fly model rockets, so perhaps coming out with highly detailed 'kits' that are really display models, may be another way for them to capitalize on their brand while staying within their current market space. I fly mostly HPR now, but there are still a number of Estes kits I would buy as desktop displays.


Tony
 
Just saw it on the estes.com site. They say "The Space X Falcon 9 is the world’s first human-rated, reusable launch vehicle."

I guess the Space Shuttle doesn't count? I understand the Falcon 9 might be "more" reusable than the Shuttle, but we're splitting hairs, aren't we?

Or maybe there's some term-of-art in the space industry I'm not aware of...
Maybe. I guess it would be better to say that it is the first CIV man rated reusable.
 
Personally, I think it's a good sign that Estes is willing to invest the amount of money that is required for the molds and artwork for a kit of this detail.
I think it is fair to assume that, in this case, "willing" simply means "pretty certain of selling a lot of them".
 
Just saw it on the estes.com site. They say "The Space X Falcon 9 is the world’s first human-rated, reusable launch vehicle."

I guess the Space Shuttle doesn't count? I understand the Falcon 9 might be "more" reusable than the Shuttle, but we're splitting hairs, aren't we?

Or maybe there's some term-of-art in the space industry I'm not aware of...
I prefer the word "refurbishable" for the space shuttle.
 
Back
Top