green dragon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2009
- Messages
- 349
- Reaction score
- 120
Originally posted by edwardw
The tanks are 2.00" OD I believe. Since the tanks are pressure rated then weldig would probably de-rate them of that. Also - why would you want to constrain your electronics bay to one position and make the motor longer? Just thinking out loud.
Edward
in order..
- I thought the tanks were aprox 2" msane as HT - which means the tube coupler idea (slip-fit / friction fit over the tank ) would work fine. this would eliminate the need to weld.
- see above, so no welding required, although , iirc, AT did test some 'stretched tank' motors, where one was attached / welded tot he top of another, so apparently they can be welded to and still manage the pressures.
- and, as for the e-bay positiion, I was thinking in terms of using the AT electronics closure ( which, coupled with the no-vent hybrid, would allow use in ANY 54mm motor mount with enough length ). Also if a flyer has the electronics closure ( for thier RMS motors ), then this would alow the use on hybrids as well.
personally, I'd use the Adept timer ,as I've already used - since mounting it in a 54mm coupler allows slip-fit over the tank , OR can be used with any other 54mm motor tubes (ie: in fornt of a plugged solid ).
of course, with most birds this large being equipped with electronics from the get-go, usually 2 step deployment,etc, then the discussion is 'useful' to only some flyers.
( such as myself, when flying the HTek in my Magnum, it has no electronics, because they did not exist in 1986 when I built the bird ).
'thinking aloud' as you said, lol .
~ AL