install a small led strip light above the desk--12" long, USB powered
hows the recuperation from your injury coming along? Are you still going to participate in the October 15th race?Enjoying what feels like the first truly pleasant day (weatherwise) of the last few months. Sunny, mild breeze, mid-70s right now. Got out early for a long run, did some yard work, now just sitting in the shade enjoying the breeze. I'm so very, very over summer, this is awesome.
Yesterday was a bit of that for me. Sunny, a little warmer that I call perfect, but not too hot (low 80s) light breeze. I not only did the small project I mentioned above, I also did a little rocket painting, sun bleached some bedding, and enjoyed the weather.Enjoying what feels like the first truly pleasant day (weatherwise) of the last few months. Sunny, mild breeze, mid-70s right now. Got out early for a long run, did some yard work, now just sitting in the shade enjoying the breeze. I'm so very, very over summer, this is awesome.
Better than I had any reason to believe it would. My run this morning was 13.1 miles, and right on desired pace. Felt a little harder than before I wrecked, but only slightly, so win there. Still 2 weeks before I can take a bike into the world, but riding on the trainer has been good. Still can't swim, so that will be the determining factor for racing or not. Right now, I'm optimistic, but never can tell.hows the recuperation from your injury coming along? Are you still going to participate in the October 15th race?
Oh, I get it; it's a Stanley, it's a Qbrick.[M]ade by Qbrick.
It's a European companyOh, I get it; it's a Stanley, it's a Qbrick.
OMG, it was a joke. Stanley KubrickIt's a European company
https://www.qbricksystem.com/en/produkt/qbrick-system-pro-700-expert/
It's a European companyOh, I get it; it's a Stanley, it's a Qbrick.
https://www.qbricksystem.com/en/produkt/qbrick-system-pro-700-expert/
And I mistyped, blowing the joke. That was supposed to be "it's not a Stanley, it's a Qbrick." Having to go back and correct a joke is even worse than having to explain it. <hangs head in shame>OMG, it was a joke. Stanley Kubrick
My apologies, I made the common error of believing others have my life experience.OMG, it was a joke. Stanley Kubrick
Hmmm. Reading glasses, superglue, and ring terminals. What sinister plan could he be hatching this time, with reading glasses, superglue, and ring terminals?
ham radio counterpoise wires.
I feel your pain. Im in avionics repair and get units to modify when COs come through to see if they are viable. 9 times out of 10 it turns into a grand cluster f%^&and similar to Boatgeek's day:
I redid a change I had to undo about 2 weeks ago, due to the fact the change was missing eh required ECOs to move it forward. And that we are trying to be strict on the ECR / ECO change procedure..
This, despite the fact 2 weeks ago the Project leader ensure d me that the ECOs were forth-coming, and that the change was needed at that particular time to ensure it all fit. This change forced a [premature] revision of the overall sub assembly, which production wasn't ready to implement..
And, on top of that (with new Project leaders who don't quite know the system), I have an ECO to change a screw [from 1/2" to 3/8" long], another to change the hole for said screw, and yet another to change the BOM to incorporate the new screw into the assembly., Along with another change to the main part for another reason..
My overall assembly is now revised by 2 major changes, spread over 5 ECOs.. possibly 2 more as I dig thru them..
ECO: Engineering Change Order - the piece of paper that authorizes the required change
ECR: Engineering Change Request - teh piece of paper that states teh desire change, and validates if teh change is do-able / wanted / cost effective / etc...
Well...My issue could have been avoided, but "management" insisted the process now be followed. they could have easily made an exception, as this task was 1/2 - 3/4 complete..
I can appreciate that. A reasonable exception here, another exception there, and in a few months to a year you've forgotten all about your good intention to start sticking to the process. The root cause was proceeding based on "The ECO is coming any day, so just go ahead and do it now." After a few managers feel the pain of having done that, there's a chance that the process will be followed properly thereafter. It's just a shame that you had to feel their pain for them.I redid a change I had to undo about 2 weeks ago, due to the fact the change was missing eh required ECOs to move it forward. And that we are trying to be strict on the ECR / ECO change procedure.
Ah, well, there's the other half of the root cause: strict adherence to the process while they don't understand it (or maybe while it's a poor process). One major change should mean one ECR/ECO pair, covering all affected items: casting, machining, assembly, BOM, wiring, software, test procedure(s), system description document(s), everything. Two simultaneous major changes means two ECR/ECO pairs, with only one revision to each item required, covering both changes at once.And, on top of that (with new Project leaders who don't quite know the system), I have an ECO to change a screw [from 1/2" to 3/8" long], another to change the hole for said screw, and yet another to change the BOM to incorporate the new screw into the assembly., Along with another change to the main part for another reason..
My overall assembly is now revised by 2 major changes, spread over 5 ECOs.. possibly 2 more as I dig thru them.
you've worked in Engineering too, I see.Well...
I can appreciate that. A reasonable exception here, another exception there, and in a few months to a year you've forgotten all about your good intention to start sticking to the process. The root cause was proceeding based on "The ECO is coming any day, so just go ahead and do it now." After a few managers feel the pain of having done that, there's a chance that the process will be followed properly thereafter. It's just a shame that you had to feel their pain for them.
Ah, well, there's the other half of the root cause: strict adherence to the process while they don't understand it (or maybe while it's a poor process). One major change should mean one ECR/ECO pair, covering all affected items: casting, machining, assembly, BOM, wiring, software, test procedure(s), system description document(s), everything. Two simultaneous major changes means two ECR/ECO pairs, with only one revision to each item required, covering both changes at once.
- DO wait on the the ECRs/ECOs to be approved before starting the drawing/BOM/document work. If the changes are really urgent, get the ECR/ECO approved in a hurry.
- DON'T create more ECRs, ECOs, and drawing/BOM/document revisions than necessary.
- ANY deviation from the process should require written approval from Director level (i.e. the next step up from the manager, whatever it is called in your organization).
- A pattern of frequent process deviations approved by directors should be looked into at the VP level.
Enter your email address to join: