But could I program you to tune into my GPS and just have you go and get my rockets?We do. And if we vibrate at just the right frequency and amplitude, we can talk to wall sockets and occasionally hear anything that is yellow.
But could I program you to tune into my GPS and just have you go and get my rockets?We do. And if we vibrate at just the right frequency and amplitude, we can talk to wall sockets and occasionally hear anything that is yellow.
But could I program you to tune into my GPS and just have you go and get my rockets?
Right wing? Left wing? What does it matter? Poorly written science is poor no matter who is publishing it.
Right there in the headline. The words "may" and the phrase "more research is needed."
I could say that if I eat a whole can of spinach like Popeye I may be able to lift a truck. It isn't at all likely, but in order to prove or disprove that claim, more research is needed. In short, anybody can say anything possible, plausible, even downright absurd, and still get it published and noticed because saying it may be true and needs further study isn't a misleading or false statement.
See also, the earth may be flat, vaccination may cause autism, there may be reptile-human hybrids living under the Denver International Airport, and I may be the ghost of Groucho Marx typing this. More research is needed to prove or disprove any of those claims.
Careful, there’s a few here.(I cant believe I just fed the troll.. )
(I cant believe I just fed the troll.. )
28 out of 33I wouldn't call it a reliable news source, regardless of it's leaning left or right..
Tabloid or Gossip yes, but not news.
Now,
Smoking marijuana is likely worse for your heart than edibles
Smoking marijuana might be worse for your heart than taking it in other ways, such as through edibles, says Nav Bajaj, MD, a cardiologist at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.
While it doesn't have "may" or "more research is needed" but it does say "might" and "likely", which is pretty darn close to "May".
I believe all who have read the article will say that yes, there MAY be some harm, and that more testing is needed. that's the whole scope of the article..
I can see "MAY" in the in paragraphs directly after the ones you quoted..
Marijuana and heart disease
According to a 2019 systematic review, marijuana may lead to a higher risk of heart disease. Out of the 33 studies included, 28 found that marijuana use can increase the risk of chronic cardiovascular disease and acute coronary syndrome, which involves a sudden rupture of plaque inside the coronary artery and may lead to a heart attack.
In addition, Bajaj and his team recently published a study in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology investigating how marijuana affects those with cardiovascular disease. An estimated 2 million people with cardiovascular disease consume marijuana, though Bajaj notes it's likely that number is under reported.
There is also a lot of "could" and "can" as well as Might.. so, really..
I bet they called people trolls who in the 1950s said that smoking cigarettes was unhealthy.(I cant believe I just fed the troll.. )
I bet they called people trolls who in the 1950s said that smoking cigarettes was unhealthy.
If you think that smoking tobacco is not addictive, I'd hate to see your CP/CG calculationsYou said it was addictive, not that it was unhealthy.
But trolls change direction whenever convenient to their argument.
Well if he dosen't think it's addictive(which it most definitely is), I hope he agrees it's extremely bad for your healthIf you think that smoking tobacco is not addictive, I'd hate to see your CP/CG calculations
Marijuana (except for medical use) should be banned. Period
We should also ban sugary drinks larger than 32 ounces...
Oh wait, someone did that already...
Land of the Free...
lol...
I have seen first-hand the physical effects of edibles, they are nasty things and should be banned. Smoking... OK, if that's your bag, but the concentration of THC or whatever else that may be in edibles is something that the body wasn't meant to metabolize.
But it harms others in the process of it
I don't see the equivocation made with drugs and alcohol, for they're totally different issues (In a nut shell looks similar but not really, another subject for another day). Activities that cause bodily harm exist everywhere and the government doesn’t ban all of it because the people conducting it are making their own choice. But like how tobacco isn’t banned but very very well campaigned about its harm, I think the government should always continue to advocate against the use of drugs and share the harm it does to your body. But when these activities start making the people involved in such activity to cause harm to society, the justice system comes into play and makes regulations to protect the safety of society. If all drug users stayed in their own property and did their body harming activities, It's stupid, but the government won’t try to stop them because they’re not causing any trouble to other people. Medical related weed users do it in a controlled manner and don’t cause harm to society, which is why it's legal in many states with proper documentation. The issue is on the other hand a lot of the other users do it illegally obtain, use, and cause harm to society which forces the government to take action in this really iffy situation. Currently it seems like filtering out responsible users from trouble makers is impossible. Another issue is studies show medical use of drugs can cause addiction to patients. The system is also abused illegally to obtain drugs. Anyway those last two points are another topic for another day I personally do not stand for any form of drug use, and will never consider the use of it even for medical use on myself. (enough studies shows the risks of medical use of drugs causing addiction which is why I do not think its worth the risk). essentially full legalization is a headache, fully making it illegal is a headache due to the medical use of it, it's really a Mexican standoff.if we follow your logic, do you want to ban alcohol too?
(is it feeding time?)
Enter your email address to join: