They are expensive to loose. Maybe if there were enough interest we could appeal to Aerotech and see if they could make them. Like buy in advance or something.
Sterling silver upper stage as a single stageTerry,
What possible model do you have in mind for an A3-6? I have a few of these and I'm not sure they'd even be OK in a Viking or a Wizard or other similar MD model....
That said, after the initial teething issues (and that case diameter problem) they are very nice motors across the line.
EXACTLYLiterally, no. But figuratively as it was stated, yes. He meant they’re fast. Or at least that’s how I took it.
a lot of 18mm Estes rockets were never designed for composite propellant. But that doesn’t mean I’m not gunna have fun sticking the motors in there and seeing what happens!
Dual deploy 18mm? Flightsketch?Take note that the D10s at Sirius are plugged motors, no ejection charge.
I've got a few D10s and D21s that I may not be using anytime soon, but the only way I'd be able to sell them would be face to face.
Maybe.....just remember that Aerotech delays tend to be closer to the full duration than most Estes delays. Having done some recent FlightSketch firmware testing using just the sustainer of my Sterling Silver I'd guess it'll be a little a late but not too bad. Here's an A8-5 flight: https://flightsketch.com/flights/2035/Sterling silver upper stage as a single stage
I really need to model this in Openrocket and see what it gives me .......Maybe.....just remember that Aerotech delays tend to be closer to the full duration than most Estes delays. Having done some recent FlightSketch firmware testing using just the sustainer of my Sterling Silver I'd guess it'll be a little a late but not too bad. Here's an A8-5 flight: https://flightsketch.com/flights/2035/
I would tend to accept prfesser's explanation that it's a practical matter.I flew one of the new C18 Qjet White Lightnings and I'm a bit disappointed in them. Very fast burning motor, might as well be a blue thunder with a visible flame. I can't quite figure out why Aerotech is making an E26 Qjet when we already have an E20W. They need to make an E around the area of an Estes E9/E12.
Is that also true for the 24mm Qjets, which are also fast burners?As Prfesser says, when you design an 18mm motor with composite propellant there are limitations. In the case of the Q-Jets, one of the key limitations was the size of the nozzle throat. It cannot be too small to fit an initiator (igniter). So that drives the burn rate to produce sufficient pressure with the minimum throat diameter and that drives the burn time. Also, black powder burns at a much faster rate than composites at low pressure. So you need more surface area with composites to generate sufficient mass flow.
Also, black powder burns at a much faster rate than composites at low pressure. So you need more surface area with composites to generate sufficient mass flow.
At black powder motor pressures, yes.Faster than "Warp 9" propellant ?
Dave F.
There are more design options with 24mm.Is that also true for the 24mm Qjets, which are also fast burners?
Faster than "Warp 9" propellant ?
Dave F.
At black powder motor pressures, yes.
Couldn't the ignitors for 18mm motors be made longer and skinnier so that the nozzle throat could be made smaller?
Farting at launches = good reason to keep social distancing in place after COVID is overAgree! To much farting around loading them up ....
Changing the grain geometry changes the surface area and mass flow rate, but not the intrinsic burning rate.Does that hold true, both in end-burner and core-burner motors ?
Dave F.
Mine are about 18" long and fit a B4 QJet. Made with 30 gauge wire wrap and tungsten bridge wire. Commercial dip.
Enter your email address to join: