Dan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2012
- Messages
- 471
- Reaction score
- 0
That's, like, less than $13.00 for an 'F' motor
I get my F motors for 6 dollars. 24/40 reloads, $18 for 3.
That's, like, less than $13.00 for an 'F' motor
No, but I could provide an Excel spreadsheet with 400 data points/second.Originally posted by tquigg
Gary, do you have the wrasp data list available for those of us who need to manually input the thrust curve in our older simualtion programs?
Best Regards
Originally posted by garoq
No, but I could provide an Excel spreadsheet with 400 data points/second.
Here it is:Originally posted by falingtrea
Do that and I would be happy to "rasp" it up for ya!
BTW, if you want to keep the original G64 performance you could simply epoxy the grains back together before placing them in the liner.Originally posted by cjl
Wow - that is a MUCH more regressive burn, and a nice high spike to get things moving
Originally posted by garoq
BTW, if you want to keep the original G64 performance you could simply epoxy the grains back together before placing them in the liner.
Originally posted by garoq
BTW, if you want to keep the original G64 performance you could simply epoxy the grains back together before placing them in the liner.
Actually the propellant weight of the G64 has always been just under 60 grams. The original numbers were a bit inaccurate, possibly due to minor errors in propellant density and volume measurement etc.Originally posted by xenon
Isn't the propellant weight at least 2.5 grams less to keep each grain under 30 grams? How would you account for that then?
As long as it's something we recommend or endorse.Originally posted by cjl
And that would still count as a certified load?
Sweet!
Originally posted by garoq
Actually the propellant weight of the G64 has always been just under 60 grams. The original numbers were a bit inaccurate, possibly due to minor errors in propellant density and volume measurement etc.
Thanks!Originally posted by bobkrech
The AT bi-G64.eng file is attached.
Bob
Originally posted by garoq
As long as it's something we recommend or endorse.
Yes.Originally posted by n3tjm
So do you endorse using epoxy to glue the grains back together?
I doubt that's likely. I'm talking about a bondline (like 0.01" or less), not a thick layer.Originally posted by n3tjm
Whats the chances of a piece of epoxy clogging the nozzle and causing a Cato. Would Aerotech/RCS warrenty cover that?
5 minute epoxy would be my recommendation. Hold the grains together until it gels.Originally posted by heada
what about any other kind of glue? CA? Yellow glue?
I'm just curious. The first one I get will probably be taped together, as thats the easiest and if I screw it up, I can always take the tape off.
-Aaron
Enter your email address to join: