- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 11,693
- Reaction score
- 6,355
If the vent fails, there’s definitely going to be a Dent……Without the Vent
It ain't a 'Dent
I must remain true to the Duct..........
If the vent fails, there’s definitely going to be a Dent……Without the Vent
It ain't a 'Dent
I must remain true to the Duct..........
With rear eject, the wrong effect.Without a Duct,
It's not the same Construct.
am I the only one that sees the irony in automatically rejecting an “outside the box solution” for this particular vendor?Ducted ejection?
Mandatory, even if
it all blows apart
(I'll stop now. )
Not "automatically". Just the goal of the build is to have a vented dent.am I the only one that sees the irony in automatically rejecting an “outside the box solution” for this particular vendor?
Lol, perfect answer. One way or another you will have a vented dent!Not "automatically". Just the goal of the build is to have a vented dent.
Eliminating the vent causes an automatic fail in meeting the goal
Just my $0.02 worth...
BABAR - I think you meant this for the other thread. But it did give me an idea for this one.If you move the vent tubes to the EDGE of the triangular body tube
That’ll look more like a slightly weird Bident I’d imagine.BABAR - I think you meant this for the other thread. But it did give me an idea for this one.
If I interpreted your comment correctly, which I tried on the Quadradent, having the tubes moved over and having 4 did not really help much (depending on the angle)
View attachment 590945
View attachment 590946View attachment 590947
But I did have a thought to have 4 tubes, but keeping things open. Basically, put 2 near a common corner
View attachment 590948 View attachment 590949
So I get my 4 tubes, but the viability of 2 (except from the side)
THOUGHTS??
Enter your email address to join: