BobH48
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2009
- Messages
- 3,388
- Reaction score
- 12
The RVT9 model is a scale model that was intended to be a static non-flying model. I am trying to adapt it to a flying model.
It can be downloaded for free at:
https://www.currell.net/models/mod_free.htm
I made it with a 5" parachute but there is so little room inside the tube that I am going to use a streamer instead.
The first tests were with a 1/2A3-2T and it was stable but only got about 40 ft up. The next try was with an A3-4T and it spun around like a tumble recovery rocket so I know I need more nose weight.
Unfortunately, I had made the body tube a little on the tight side and the hot engine stuck itself inside and I pulled the tube out getting the engine out .
It looks repairable so I am going to glue the tube back in and try it with more nose weight.
when I get the amount of weight to use figured out, I'm goin to build another one only I'll make the motor tube a little bigger.
I made it with 110 lb. cardstock but the small details are hard with that weight paper. I think I'll try 67 lb. coverstock instead.
It can be downloaded for free at:
https://www.currell.net/models/mod_free.htm
I made it with a 5" parachute but there is so little room inside the tube that I am going to use a streamer instead.
The first tests were with a 1/2A3-2T and it was stable but only got about 40 ft up. The next try was with an A3-4T and it spun around like a tumble recovery rocket so I know I need more nose weight.
Unfortunately, I had made the body tube a little on the tight side and the hot engine stuck itself inside and I pulled the tube out getting the engine out .
It looks repairable so I am going to glue the tube back in and try it with more nose weight.
when I get the amount of weight to use figured out, I'm goin to build another one only I'll make the motor tube a little bigger.
I made it with 110 lb. cardstock but the small details are hard with that weight paper. I think I'll try 67 lb. coverstock instead.