HOMA
Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2022
- Messages
- 6
- Reaction score
- 19
First off my Thanks to @Alan R and @waltr for their contributions in Alan's build thread. I have several sims attached and for the 3" School Rocket I used their sims as my starting point. The sims attached with the -stock label are for anyone else that needs them. I have adjusted all the weights per the parts I received. I also included a sim of the original LPR School Rocket
I am building two versions of the BMS 3" School Rocket. The first and primary project, will be a 3FNC version with the 34in body tube and payload bay. The second project is a Cluster of 24mm motors using the original 17" body tube.
29mm - Purpose of this build is to construct a rocket that can stay in the mid-power motor range, work on new building techniques, and launch capabilities. As I will be using the stock 4 fins on the cluster project, I will need to make my own fins. I haven't decided on a design yet and I could use some advice on that. I have read that the fin height should be a least one caliber of your body tube. I'm also well aware that it needs at least 1 caliber of stability. I've attached two sims using the fin design from some kits that I like. An advice or suggestions? The ply stock I have, is slightly lighter than the OpenRocket default weight for birch ply. I am going out tomorrow to some local hardware stores to see if they have any 1/8in ply in stock of better quality then what I picked up from HobbyLobby.
Payload bay/Recovery- this rocket will utilize motor ejection/single deploy. I was gifted an Estes Altimeter which I plan to make use of, but I don't currently have any other electronics. I plan to friction fit the nose cone with a backup Kevlar line as the nose cone will be shared between this project and the cluster. I have a 24" parachute from Top Flight. I will probably need to pick up the 30", but I will decide once I have a final build weight. Landing should be on a field or farm land that is usually not too hard. I have plenty of kevlar line from emma kites to make a harness. What is the preferred layout? Could I go from the booster to the payload bay and have another line from the booster to the parachute or should it be all one line with the parachute 1/3 of the way or more down the line to the booster?
Cluster- My plan was to just use the original 17" body tube and the nose cone. In OpenRocket this configuration with motors resulted in a rocket with less than 1 caliber of stability. If I use the payload bay as well then stability is over 1 caliber. While I wanted the build to be more of a stubby, I don't see how I can just use the 17" body tube without adding nose weight. Adding nose weight isn't an option right now as I am sharing the nose cone with the 29mm build.
I am building two versions of the BMS 3" School Rocket. The first and primary project, will be a 3FNC version with the 34in body tube and payload bay. The second project is a Cluster of 24mm motors using the original 17" body tube.
29mm - Purpose of this build is to construct a rocket that can stay in the mid-power motor range, work on new building techniques, and launch capabilities. As I will be using the stock 4 fins on the cluster project, I will need to make my own fins. I haven't decided on a design yet and I could use some advice on that. I have read that the fin height should be a least one caliber of your body tube. I'm also well aware that it needs at least 1 caliber of stability. I've attached two sims using the fin design from some kits that I like. An advice or suggestions? The ply stock I have, is slightly lighter than the OpenRocket default weight for birch ply. I am going out tomorrow to some local hardware stores to see if they have any 1/8in ply in stock of better quality then what I picked up from HobbyLobby.
Payload bay/Recovery- this rocket will utilize motor ejection/single deploy. I was gifted an Estes Altimeter which I plan to make use of, but I don't currently have any other electronics. I plan to friction fit the nose cone with a backup Kevlar line as the nose cone will be shared between this project and the cluster. I have a 24" parachute from Top Flight. I will probably need to pick up the 30", but I will decide once I have a final build weight. Landing should be on a field or farm land that is usually not too hard. I have plenty of kevlar line from emma kites to make a harness. What is the preferred layout? Could I go from the booster to the payload bay and have another line from the booster to the parachute or should it be all one line with the parachute 1/3 of the way or more down the line to the booster?
Cluster- My plan was to just use the original 17" body tube and the nose cone. In OpenRocket this configuration with motors resulted in a rocket with less than 1 caliber of stability. If I use the payload bay as well then stability is over 1 caliber. While I wanted the build to be more of a stubby, I don't see how I can just use the 17" body tube without adding nose weight. Adding nose weight isn't an option right now as I am sharing the nose cone with the 29mm build.
Attachments
Last edited: