CTI Cesaroni Technology

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Impossible! APCP ISP tops out around 266 at best.

JD

IF the casing were about 72" long and, filled with finely ground shavings:rolleyes: Anything could happen...

I KNOW some of you are going to really like the *NEW* __mm 6XL motor. I've already got "Dibb's" on the first demo...maybe at Airfest:confused:

No more talk.:no:
 
IF the casing were about 72" long and, filled with finely ground shavings:rolleyes: Anything could happen...

I KNOW some of you are going to really like the *NEW* __mm 6XL motor. I've already got "Dibb's" on the first demo...maybe at Airfest:confused:

No more talk.:no:

You're killing me.

:pop:
 
My friend, WarnerR is preparing to fly a Pro29 6XL Classic or White load soon in the WM Blackhawk 29 - told him to buy the tapered closure for some real fun.

We are wondering if it is possible to sku up one or a pair of Tapped 'no-ejection' charge wells for min diameter or electronics only deployment without digging in and altering the existing motor charge . Aeropack does not have a 29 or 24mm min diameter hardware.

The new long burn propellant sounds exciting..will the motors feature an offset core like some of the other longburns or have you cooked up something new?

Kenny
 
Last edited:
IF the casing were about 72" long and, filled with finely ground shavings:rolleyes: Anything could happen...

I KNOW some of you are going to really like the *NEW* __mm 6XL motor. I've already got "Dibb's" on the first demo...maybe at Airfest:confused:

No more talk.:no:



I sure hope you are talking about the 6XL 98mm N1800 WLB I have been waiting forever for!
 
No.

It's the new 24mm 6XL H-112.

Obviously.

Or perhaps not. But that'd still be wicked cool.


Later!

--Coop
 
Your phone call last week triggered this post.

I think it is time for a teaser. Our newest propellant. This is a Pro38-6GXL motor in a regular grain configuration. Working designation is -M (Mellow).

[YOUTUBE]9MeilOF8iPc[/YOUTUBE]

CAR/MCC has a new chairman. In the next session (June?), we are planning to certify this propellant in several motor sizes.

Jeroen

Must be running on really high Kn values... This opens the door to really long motors :cool:

Perhaps a full L in 54mm, a 3-inch N, 38mm K, etc... I would encourage you to consider some of these "niche products". That would be simply awesome.
 
I saw Bob fly the new long burn at NYPower. It made a huge impression on me. The thing had legs for days.
 
I'm working on the rest of my QCRS Memorial Day photoset, but I couldn't resist sharing early, this one turned out pretty good :D

CTI K4000VM:
K4K-8028.jpg
 
I'm working on the rest of my QCRS Memorial Day photoset, but I couldn't resist sharing early, this one turned out pretty good :D

CTI K4000VM:
View attachment 174216

Fantastic DOF! Very sharp! I've about figured the pre-sets required with my rig for nice shots, but this sharp and this depth don't happen very often at all. Nice job!


Mark
 
Fantastic DOF! Very sharp! I've about figured the pre-sets required with my rig for nice shots, but this sharp and this depth don't happen very often at all. Nice job!


Mark

What exactly do you mean by that? It's a great capture, but it's neither particularly shallow nor deep DOF.

I love the appearance of the flame from the multi-throat nozzle.
 
What exactly do you mean by that? It's a great capture, but it's neither particularly shallow nor deep DOF.

I mean that for a nice sharp image of a rocket straight off the pad, you generally need to be as wide open as possible..or use a flash. The fact that he has the rocket stopped and people in the background in focus is a large DOF for such a fast action shot.


Mark
 
I mean that for a nice sharp image of a rocket straight off the pad, you generally need to be as wide open as possible..or use a flash. The fact that he has the rocket stopped and people in the background in focus is a large DOF for such a fast action shot.


Mark

It could be cropped from a wider shot, which inherently would have less background blur.

I for one would have preferred shallow DOF for that.
 
Great photo David. Thanks for posting. I think you caught it just before burn-out !

Jeroen
 
Yes great photo regardless of whatever anyone else says.....All I hear in the background is "well technically"...............Thanks for sharing Dr. Reeserrrrrr!
 
What happened too QC?? I got one at home on a pro 29. G when it should be F. Post pics once back home.


Sent from my iPhone using Rocketry Forum
 
What happened too QC?? I got one at home on a pro 29. G when it should be F. Post pics once back home.


Sent from my iPhone using Rocketry Forum

Oh. my. goodness. Do you really need to post a photo?

It is a mere oops at the keyboard....this is the second thread I've seen this posted on; Much Ado about Nothing! The number that precedes the letter (ie 1654 mentioned above) is the total impulse; this tells you what class the motor is. If an individual can't figure out that a 54-5G load with a total impulse of 1654 is a K, then you shouldn't IMO be flying that motor (after all, impulse related questions are on the L2 exam).

The only questions I'd ask myself would be something like: did I get the right number of grains in my reload with the right flavor propellant and did it work as expected. If so, I'm happy (and won't get panties in a wad if a great manufacturer occasionally makes a mistake that doesn't actually affect anything!).

Sorry, rant over. Just thought that this banter about one or two typo'd letters is a bit silly. What do I know?:cyclops:

Dr. J. said its fixed; let's move along, shall we?:)

-Eric-
 
Back
Top