CzTeacherMan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2014
- Messages
- 2,982
- Reaction score
- 171
I didn't test specifically for early or late delay. But making sure the chute bundle is properly rolled and wrapped is critical, as I found out on my third flight. If the bundle is wrapped well, early or late ejection shouldn't make a difference on the chute release. When you get one, you'll want to be sure to try wrapping bundles in varying configurations and bounce it around, maybe spin it around for some Gs... Basically be sure that your bundle is tight and won't come undone. Is there a chance it could pull out? Sure, but if you test your bundle, you can minimize that chance.
And I always attach a tracker on every flight, every time. Don't need it 90% of the time, but when I do, I'm glad it's there.
There's going to be a lot of what ifs until this is out in the field everywhere. But really, the device is pretty idiot proof. Just keep at it and it'll work great. I was thrilled to test and can't wait to get one.
And I always attach a tracker on every flight, every time. Don't need it 90% of the time, but when I do, I'm glad it's there.
There's going to be a lot of what ifs until this is out in the field everywhere. But really, the device is pretty idiot proof. Just keep at it and it'll work great. I was thrilled to test and can't wait to get one.
Calm down, I'm not asking people to deliberately trash their cherished rockets. I'm not even that concerned with zippers. A bundled chute having less drag is obvious.
What I'm asking is what sort of off-nominal testing people have seen, intentional or accidental. Early or late deployments are going to happen sometimes, and it would be nice to know how this device handles those events. I certainly don't think it's going to intentionally release at apogee, but how well does the rubber band retention work? Can it be tight enough to avoid an unintentional unwrapping in a high shock deployment? Will packing it that tight make it harder for the retention pin to reliably release? How strong is the retaining force? Is the device pretty durable to banging around in that scenario?
Off nominal testing is a key part of every product development, and this is being marketed as a premium, professional product - so I think it's fair to ask how those tests turned out and how well it handles common, predictable stress cases.