- Joined
- Mar 27, 2013
- Messages
- 22,537
- Reaction score
- 14,955
Yup!!! Thanks!Wait, you built this in OR? Am I understanding this correctly?
Other than that, I'm baffled and impressed
Yup!!! Thanks!
As for the rest of you... I was told not to give too much away, so I can't confirm or deny any thing else at this time.
I at least want to know one thing. How many individual parts are used in that model?!
Why?
Why?
Contract work...
How the crap did you thread something in OR! Normally I use solidworks at university for threads.Yup!!! Thanks!
As for the rest of you... I was told not to give too much away, so I can't confirm or deny any thing else at this time.
If you're producing it for ad copy, you've instantly got the right look and feel for people who are already familiar with OR.The only possible reason I can think of for something like this would be to have a cool cutaway for OR's rocket motor selection.
Otherwise, an hour with pretty much any solid modeling program would produce something similar.
Glad you got paid for it at any rate, that couldn't have been quick....
3D renderings by Jim Parsons of the new Quest Q-Jets for the motor instruction sheet. Despite the way it looks, getting the initiator placed at the top of the propellant core space is not difficult at all. The slot for the A motor is actually quite large and runs from one side of the grain to the other. The slot for the B motor is somewhat narrower but extends past the centerline of the grain by about 1/16”. The C and D motors are center core burners. The Q-Jets were designed so that the initiator is positioned at the same location regardless of motor size. This is accomplished by a spacer tube installed between the propellant grain and nozzle. There is a piece of heat shrink tubing on the initiator leads that serves as a visual indicator of proper placement.
Woohoo!
Enter your email address to join: