Time for no good, stinking mindsim!You could create the model with pods. However, it won't be stable: the spherical fins won't contribute to CP.
View attachment 625891
ORK attached below.
There is space for a 3/16" rod to go through. I have a brass tube as a guide above the balls. Will post a final picture after it is painted. Will spin test it then also.Yes Mr. RSO. Base drag is my friend!
Do the gaps give a good place to put the launch rod?
All those balls remind me of an SNL skit with ole shoot-em's Baldwin.
Swings tests rock! Cardboard cut outs roll! So many tools to quell the fear.There is space for a 3/16" rod to go through. I have a brass tube as a guide above the balls. Will post a final picture after it is painted. Will spin test it then also.
Why?I have no doubts it will be stable.
The file I posted should be reasonably accurate as far as drag is concerned (I think?)I am just wanting to get altitude estimates and the delay times needed.
Keep in mind: spheres provide no lift and no base drag. That is why they don’t contribute to CP at all. This is essentially a rocket with no fins.Mainly because it has a fairly heavy nose cone and is quite long. I am new to using open rocket (a long time rocksim user). Will look at the drag calculations on the file you posted.
Thank you for doing that, it is much nicer than the one I created!
Neither of which factors into stability. Net effect of the balls on CP is zero.They provide quite a lot of skin and interference drag, though.
Keep in mind: spheres provide no lift and no base drag. That is why they don’t contribute to CP at all.
Enter your email address to join: