well I go for my L1 tomorrow.
L1 success going out for l2 at appoge right now forgot my paperwork at home
that sucks man rebuild it and make it do a successful flight show it whos boss
you could rebuild it easily what did it weigh? it must have weather cocked alot on a h100 sparky I got around 2300 ft and mine weighed 4lbs. I am glad you bought another kit hate to see you give up after putting all that work into this one it was a great looking rocket.
Just a couple of thoughts on your failure. I noticed in the previous pics that you have the HA 45K hooked up to what looks like a AA battery for power. Did you use that or did you use the recommended 9v? What ematches did you use? Both 3f and 4f work well for deployments so you are okay there. Did you ground test? That will tell you a lot about how much BP to use. For a 3" bird I use anywhere between 1.4 and 2.2 grams of BP depending on the size of the bay. You may also try using an actual switch next time as well. G forces play hell with wires and connections. I am not positive but the twist and tuck method I believe is not endorsed by the NAR safety code. One other thing I noticed is your vent holes looked a bit ragged. Sand them with a fine grit of sandpaper. Perfectflite's hole calculator doesn't seem to agree with others I use. Try Vern Knowles web site www.vernk.com he has a great calculator on there and all the math to back it up.
Hope this helps!
I'm sorry about the demise of your rocket. Hopefully you will rebuild it!
To answer some questions: Absolutely 3F vs 4F plays a factor. The 4F burns much faster, which creates a lot more pressure for the same volume of BP. Put another way, if you used 1 gram of both 3F and 4F, the 4F will generate more pressure than the 3F due to burning more rapidly.
Next- A standard rule of thumb for ANY dual deploy rocket should be to GROUND TEST! Basically, prep the rocket like you would for flight, sans loaded motor of course. This means pack the chutes, nomex, dog barf, install shear pins.. Basically, get the rocket ready the same exact way you are planning for it's flight. Prep your charges the same way, connect the shock cords the same way.. You get the idea.
This also means that you need to load (and fire) the charges you think you are going to need for deployment. For a 3" rocket, I would start with 1 gram and then work my way up in .5 gram increments if the ejection charges fail to deploy.
Seriously, ground testing should really be done prior to any flight of a new rocket. The idea is that if you can get it to work on the ground, then you increase the probability of success of the flight working in the air.
It's a harsh lesson to learn in the manner that you did, but hopefully you'll be able to learn from it in the future. And remember that nothing is 100% fool proof. The idea is that you are simply trying to increase the probability of success by testing your set up while it's on the ground rather than in the air.
Also, I attached a zip file with an excel spreadsheet based on Vern K's formula on his website. My buddy Tim Scott and I created it, so hopefully you will find that useful as well!
:cry:Ouch! That one hurt. I hope you go at it again. You may want to go for motor and/or redundant apogee deployment for your cert. flight. Less to go wrong. More redundancy is better.
Look at it from the glass half full prospective. At least you got the up part right.
What were your charge sizes? My motto is "Blow it out or Blow it up".:surprised:
Don't skimp on the BP it's cheap.
You seem to have the right attitude for this hobby. If I would have quit after each failure I would have been done years ago. Needless to say I have boxes of crumpled body tubes and broken parts acquired over the years. When I bust one up I just build the next one bigger and better.
Hope to see you at a launch one day soon,
Enter your email address to join: