Boosterdude
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2009
- Messages
- 1,664
- Reaction score
- 29
The Ares I-X roll out this morning was very impressive, not a bad looking rocket at all. It's on the pad now getting ready for the launch next week.
The behemoth crawler transporter just seems like overkill with that skinny little stick sitting on it...
It even looks like there's room for two. Drag race?
heheh....
There's something vaquely "Soyuz" about that payload section....
That's good, because the Soyuz works!
Yeah, but it's 40 years old! Way to go, NASA, bringing us the latest in 1960s launch vehicle engineering.
I've come to the conclusion it's just a firework.
Better to be alive with 40 year old yet steadily improved technology than dead on the bleeding edge.
Agreed, and sometimes the bleeding edge keeps you in lower earth orbit for 30 years servicing the biggest waste...ISS.
I say drop the ISS, and lets go back to the Moon/Mars. There will be more usable technology/science that comes from these missions then the ISS could ever help to produce.
Nah - we need to add a bit more to the ISS and turn it into an orbital drydock - then we can really get things going!!!
Nah - we need to add a bit more to the ISS and turn it into an orbital drydock - then we can really get things going!!!
And then move the whole thing to one of the LaGrange points between the earth and Sun.
Why do we send men into space at all? It is very expensive payload of limited scientific value. We went to the moon to find out it smells like burnt gunpowder? Great! Probes and landers, please. Probes and landers.
Why do we send men into space at all? It is very expensive payload of limited scientific value. We went to the moon to find out it smells like burnt gunpowder? Great! Probes and landers, please. Probes and landers.
Bottom line there are things people do better. The distance traveled is just one easy to cite example.
The behemoth crawler transporter just seems like overkill with that skinny little stick sitting on it.
The shuttle (on the MLP) is still the heaviest object transported by the crawler, due to the mass of the solid fuel in the SRB’s.BTW- the Ares I-X weighs more than 3 times the weight of an unfueled Saturn V... the crawler had its work cut out for it.
Why do we send men into space at all? It is very expensive payload of limited scientific value. We went to the moon to find out it smells like burnt gunpowder? Great! Probes and landers, please. Probes and landers.
Remember, a shuttle flight costs more than a Saturn V flight did... it would have been cheaper to just keep using Saturn V's... if we had, we could have orbited a whole series of 'Skylab' stations in orbit, linked 4-5 together and had a WAY bigger station than ISS in only a couple years instead of the 20 years it's taken to do ISS, and for WAY less money than ISS cost... we could also have modded these stations for lunar orbit, L1/L2, and used them as a basis for Mars/deep space transit habs... We could have had a whole scientific program of lunar exploration, long duration stays, and a small lunar base by now... But all the money and the last 30 years have been wasted on shuttles in LEO piddling about... Shuttle is a 100 ton to orbit rocket that hauls 15 tons of payload... ISS SHOULD have been built using expendable rockets and shuttles ferrying only supplies and equipment and delivering the crews.
Supposedly Saturn V and the moon program got cancelled because it was too costly. Now we have Constellation which promises to make Apollo/Saturn's costs look like chickenfeed by comparison.... They've already gutted the budget for probes that would have produced FAR more scientific knowledge and exploration expansion, all to do a repeat of Apollo that they can't get right and we can't afford anyway...
It's rediculous... but then again, it's the GOVERNMENT!!! OL JR
Enter your email address to join: