You should know what that means, considering how much you've been posting everywhere on how easy amateur rocketry is.
Don't waste your time trolling Bob. I helped found university rocket team for UTC last year, designed two supersonic multistage competition HPR rockets, and placed third nationally at SEDS which was a $4.5k inkling of this. We attempted a TRA record once. We drove to three states and had to integrate design fixes into designs after unsuccessful first test flight. Then we flew a different design which worked. 68 engineering college teams some from aerospace universities couldn't finish 3,000ft in two academic semesters. I could rant how I designed components most people told us were impossible to machine, or that we actually found ways to produce these impossible to machine parts with patentable features eventually despite how common naysayers wanted to belittle us. Bob here doesn't know how hard it is to get a drag coefficient of an object in solidworks from scratch at undergrad university level. How they have a 1" x 1" wind tunnel space de rated to Mach 0.8, and UTSI or NAS wants millions of dollars so you can get one number for one drag force equation at a Mach number way greater than 1 for an object that doesn't really exist yet outside of a one off prototype or a computer model. Then you've hit your technical limit of knowledge at undergrad senior year engineering and you have to ask industry experts with more efficient computing methods and probably 20+ years of hypersonics flow analysis research to take your models into fine mesh for three weeks because a military supersonic airfoil isn't fine mesh enough. They wanted Aerotech fuel specs. We eventually saw oblique shockwaves and supersonic exhaust gas plumes in particle effects on a PC screen. They called supersonic trivial then meshing took them weeks. Without all that effort we wouldn't have had info to start a structural analysis. Oh yeah CTI claimed everything was proprietary even casing threads. The research professors disliked CTI a lot from a technical info standpoint on fuel compounds to just simulate a model.
Had to assume sustainer was a boosted dart with other program specs at one point.
ANSYS only had 60 plus boundary layers with F600.314 not actual nice logos like front nosecone or trailing edge fin, it was such a frustration of a program that the professors were like let us use our hard codes from industry experience because it will take less time. We had technical knowledge to design nosecones, nozzles, casings, and open rocket to us seemed trivial except we lacked practical amatuer experience and the lack of practical flight experience was a horrific disaster and tedious learning curve process. Everything you amateurs call common sense we lacked. We made some mistakes on design. We had to learn from those mistakes. We pixy dusted an interstage at Mach 1.5 because we had never designed a rocket interstage before. Anybody who calls it easy is a nutcase. They don't even have a senior engineer student course load or an idea of what mathmatical h*** really is. 67% of the people next to you thought they were dumb and they already quit engineering path. You've got stubborn workaholic super seniors or Einstein wannabes left. Then the university itself will find ways to lawyer term any grant money into tax ident numbers even the professors can't retrieve at department level for simple raw material purchases for these engineering projects. The engineering department makes students raise funds. And they expect it in two semesters or a new engineering team is assigned with no experience. Engineer students sigh in relieve or pass out or get drunk at end of semester from the pain and misery. Then the communications people are all snotty and hyper and won't leave you alone after the university gets a headline story for months of effort. They like bob likely never had to use solidworks, ANSYS, FinSim, open rocket, or excel much or take calculus three or differential equations or controls. They never had deadlines with FCC\FAA\TRA paperwork and academia processes that require months of effort to achieve simple money transfers. No amount of rambling will convey the hardships by students.
A professor once said, you students have more leeway than I do about project funding. It was easier for us kids to use internship money in donations than it was for university to swap accounts or whatnot. These campuses are probably flipping out about mixing an R motor in a Chem lab, can't imagine what these guys and gals are going through. Likely hair loss and anxiety. If they fail senior design project they may have to take design courses sequentially again.
Task isn't impossible. It will take a lot of effort and will likely not succeed first attempt. There may not be a budget for second attempt. There's guys and gals with IREC team experience that can chime in. Basically I'd call it a slight miracle if it works as planned given how low experience the college teams are. The amateurs have more practical experience and they call this extremely hard.