Folks in this thread that are nervous that there will be a bunch of hate dumped on Muslims, and keep repeating phrases such as, "We can't blame all Muslims blah blah blah" I say that you're correct. Muslims don't seem to be the problem.
Radical Muslims are the problem. And they've very helpfully decided to band together in a club called ISIS, or ISIL, or whatever they're called these days. It makes it easier to identify the bad guys. If you're a member of that club, you're a target. If you're a Muslim and not a member of ISIS, you're not a target. People that are not members of ISIS can definitely become targets by certain actions, but I believe that as a member that stands with the terrorists you should be a target even if you haven't personally been up to terrorist activities. Being a member is enough of an activity to get you on the kill list.
You will probably be surprised but I mostly agree with you here.
That said, there is the slightly troublesome detail about exactly what constitutes "standing with the terrorists". I don't think there is any question about someone in ISIL "uniform" actively threatening with a gun/explosives/knife/weapon, or actively recruiting jihadists, or raising money for the cause, or any of that. I doubt you would find anyone here (including those pesky liberals) that would disagree that this person is the enemy and should be treated as such.
But what about someone who says things in public that are in general sympathy for their cause, even partially?
What about someone who visits jihadist websites, reads their material, or re-tweets something in support?
What about someone who "has ties" in the form of relatives, however distant, who may do the things above, or even be outright "members"?
What about someone who has recently visited an area where ISIL holds some power or influence?
What about someone who doesn't shout "death to the terrorists!" quite loud enough at your local gathering?
And for all these things above, does it make a difference if the person in question is a Muslim or not?
Do any of these conditions above merit someone automatically being "on the kill list?"
And who gets to decide, by what criteria, with or without a fair trial?
And if so, do you REALLY think that this is in keeping with American (or even Christian) values?
If you're a Muslim and not a member of ISIS, you're not a target.
On this point I can't disagree with you more. I honestly think you are being pretty naïve or disingenuous here.
s6