Thats about what I'm gonna do, thank you!!
Thats about what I'm gonna do, thank you!!
I personally saw two of these BD's lawn dart recently. We heard and saw the ejection charges go. Nose cones didn't separate.I will repeat here what I said on Facebook 3 years ago. There are over 400 flight logs of the Estes Big Daddy on Rocketreviews.com. Not a single crash listed. And none listed since my comment 3 years ago. It just amazes me that this supposed "big problem" keeps showing up on social media, generating tons of explanations, pontifications, and solutions, yet one of the biggest launch databases available for any rocket ever sold doesn't mention a single crash.
Estes has been selling the Big Daddy to anyone who wants to buy one, no special skills required, for 25 years now. They've never felt the need to modify the nosecone or the instructions.
If you want to modify the Big Daddy nosecone, modify away. But please don't claim that it's necessary. There's just no data that that's true.
If you build your Big Daddy for use with 38 or 54mm stuff, you will have to cut the bottom off the nose for recovery. So, for me the problem solved itself.
My 29mm has a partition. The 38/54 have a hollow nose for the parachute.
Can you post a photo of that partition?
I think using electronics for deployment will actually minimize the risk of damage, since you can control your deployment much more precisely.Yeah, give me a day or so. I can also show how I put nose weight in the 38 and 54 for HED. I'll try and give a picture of them all.
The 38 has flown an H-550, the 54 was built to fly a J250 length (852) motor and has only done an 38mm H283. It will take a pretty rare day when I want to send the 54 on a J at our launch area. I'm a little reluctant to get carried away with electronics, as it is still an Estes body (even though glassed) so potential for damage is high.
First flight mine was pretty much trashed back in 2013, luckily the ground was soft, and it darted nicely with no body tube or nosecone damage. Gonna fix that today, Along with two fresh ones to build, one being 29mm and the other with upgraded fins..I personally saw two of these BD's lawn dart recently. We heard and saw the ejection charges go. Nose cones didn't separate.
But I guess, since these crashes were not listed on Rocketreviews, they did not happen?
Come on, Man!
I contacted Estes about the safety concern last week, they told me they have their "own research and development team"...lol, So I told her they need to do their jobs and that was it....Severe diagonal cutaways on the base of nose cones are a Bad Idea (tm) from an engineering standpoint, for the reasons above - lateral force plus early venting of the pressure before the nose cone is off results in not getting the laundry out. I've also seen the molded-in loops fail way too often. They may be designed that way to allow having the molded-in loop without increasing the length of the mold tooling, which costs $$. Overall I consider those nose cones a safety hazard, and always put a replacement bulkhead on them with a metal eyebolt, much like Mike's picture.
Enter your email address to join: