PML EXPLORER ??

Discussion in 'Mid Power Rocketry (MPR)' started by Andy Greene, Jul 12, 2018.

  1. Jul 12, 2018 #1

    Andy Greene

    Andy Greene

    Andy Greene

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2013
    Messages:
    900
    Likes Received:
    0
    Picked up a robbed ( someone stole some parts out of it- no biggie ) PML Explorer kit today and wondered if anyone has any experience with that kit ?
    Tips , tricks - performance ?? All Ears before I start the build,Im not going to use the piston eject- Read a few reviews and it seems to like Soft H- Motors
     
  2. Jul 12, 2018 #2

    aerostadt

    aerostadt

    aerostadt

    Lifetime Supporter TRF Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    2,399
    Likes Received:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Brigham City, UT
  3. Jul 12, 2018 #3

    aerostadt

    aerostadt

    aerostadt

    Lifetime Supporter TRF Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    2,399
    Likes Received:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Brigham City, UT
  4. Jul 12, 2018 #4

    Andy Greene

    Andy Greene

    Andy Greene

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2013
    Messages:
    900
    Likes Received:
    0
  5. Jul 12, 2018 #5

    aerostadt

    aerostadt

    aerostadt

    Lifetime Supporter TRF Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    2,399
    Likes Received:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Brigham City, UT
  6. Jul 12, 2018 #6

    Steve Shannon

    Steve Shannon

    Steve Shannon

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    2,962
    Likes Received:
    21
    I’ve built and flown two of them. One I lost in Canada in 2002 at Roc Lake (that is how it was spelled then) which I flew on a J350. As I recall it should have flown to about 6400 feet. It was one of the last flights on the last day and we ran out of time to find it before driving back to Montana.
    I liked it so much that I built another and the second one I built around the PML CPR3k system. I flew it many times, including once on an H999, a flight that still brings me joy. I finally retired it when the fin flutter from some of the more extreme flights began causing the G10 fins to crack along the aft end of the root edge.
    Both were Quantum tube and both used pistons.
     
  7. Jul 12, 2018 #7

    Nytrunner

    Nytrunner

    Nytrunner

    Master of Rivets

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2016
    Messages:
    2,365
    Likes Received:
    18
    How fast did it go on the 999?
     
  8. Jul 12, 2018 #8

    Steve Shannon

    Steve Shannon

    Steve Shannon

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    2,962
    Likes Received:
    21
    Fast enough to make a bunch of grown men giggle like kids. I only had a Missile Works RRC2 in it, so no logging.
     
  9. Jul 12, 2018 #9

    Nytrunner

    Nytrunner

    Nytrunner

    Master of Rivets

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2016
    Messages:
    2,365
    Likes Received:
    18
    One day I may want to try a Qtube rocket and empirical data is always helpful.

    I'm sure I could get a ballpark figure in openrocket
     
  10. Jul 12, 2018 #10

    Steve Shannon

    Steve Shannon

    Steve Shannon

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    2,962
    Likes Received:
    21
    I’ve flown them well over Mach in case that’s what you’re wondering.
     
  11. Jul 12, 2018 #11

    Nytrunner

    Nytrunner

    Nytrunner

    Master of Rivets

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2016
    Messages:
    2,365
    Likes Received:
    18
    Fascinating, most things I read say Qtube has a speed limit around transonic.

    Any bracing or special accommodations? Or just careful construction and alignment?
     
  12. Jul 12, 2018 #12

    Steve Shannon

    Steve Shannon

    Steve Shannon

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    2,962
    Likes Received:
    21
    The problem I see with Quantum Tube is flexibility. At LDRS 27, I flew a Q-Tube Sudden Rush on a K-2045 one time. It broke after burnout when the phenolic coupler broke. The Quantum Tube was just fine. The chute blew out every panel. A better coupler or single tube rocket with a chute release might be great.
    I don’t think it would be great for long time periods at high velocity, but very few of our flights do that. Off center spinning or coning would be bad too. Here’s what happens to polycarbonate when subjected to out of balance spinning. One second it was spinning eccentrically and then it just folded up:
    IMG_0520.JPG
     
  13. Jul 12, 2018 #13

    Nytrunner

    Nytrunner

    Nytrunner

    Master of Rivets

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2016
    Messages:
    2,365
    Likes Received:
    18
    Greater tube flex->greater joint stresses on brittle coupler (or any coupler really)? Good to know

    Safe as a payload tube perhaps? With a pml phenolic or fiberglass booster tube so the parts fit?
     
  14. Jul 13, 2018 #14

    seth_cooper

    seth_cooper

    seth_cooper

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2015
    Messages:
    65
    Likes Received:
    1
    I have one from back in the launch lug days. I don't use the piston on PML kits.

    Perfect for H motors. I get 1600-2200' on H's.

    Last time I launched it was on an H410. Someone said "that was all coast".

    Buried it in the ground once after a failed ejection charge, a few inches up the airframe. Got a little crack in the airframe when I was removing it. Chopped it off below the crack and got a new nosecone and it's back in business.

    Great and durable rocket.
     

Share This Page