LOC PRECISION - TUBES, NOSE CONES, ETC - BEST PRICES ?

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I don't like wasting money and, yes, the budget is tight. This flight is going to be as simple and inexpensive, as possible. My goal here is to get my L3 Cert "ticket" punched, pure & simple !

Basic "flight plan" ( with a little "humor" added )

(1) It goes up "pointy-end first", fire comes out the bottom . . . "Low & Slow" on an M650, two
Missileworks RRC3's.

(2) Drogue @ Apogee . . . No "drama".

(3) Main @ 1000 ft AGL . . . Clean "laundry" deployment . . . No zipper.

(4) Landing - "Welcome to Level 3" !

Dave F.

Nothing wrong with that at all.
 
Nope. If I ever do one it will be exactly this type of flight profile. Low and slow gets the girls you know.
 
ALL my experiences with PML motor tube is that all the ones I have been involved with helping build have been too tight for the motor casing and we ended up laboriously sanding the inside of each

the tubes were fine before gluing into the rockets, they shrink at each glue seam
I cannot tell you how many wasted hours that was, MANY

I am a big fan of the new blue tube and will use it for any rocket that I design which so far have been 9, 2 4", 2 3", 2 2.5", 2 2", 2 1.5" and 1 1"

here are the 4 and 3"
the 4" have been up on full K to 7K feet, I have a mid L to burn when the wind is right


VNfCqli1xigpPoYZyjGEVtXVUVi08RwY6hmDGj7UN19LIRqkImGBibisOS1eErpRkmzWkUBf_iytnd4Nn2Hyyaq8l1T2FINO2e-db1io21pfiwOYe35FVH4KgNi-jIBmE49zuI41OGvjcke8krbBEVoSmGxbG9Nb1h2L5z8UFXG-aky57hE9lW5fiQcP5gbZmKNZ1sZWUJPn9sYwGBZm9ppS7N0VF_Jy2z0SOS1BCTlhsEvHGnDCwDQjT3MtCRzMwReBYFY6eTXOAkrVwG74sOp0pIkTLWQfsMEhtiEU0UW-qTy4oKKQc4KurDhiz8IFIabSPGVcwdZccgNvF_iJ_tBxOWsrpPc-kPr55Ydo7viJFU8vOVNN3EnGVuBPDbGVpEnWXXA_xhCIAQnzO6U9HzXTxvlrRTtHBlttNysL51N-ucgpFj9KJX8yX1k3A0nHz3UPcICi-lAYJNXwTHsKxcnYG-gxduY9Tul4-_OL7Tsn3tCiZ4_X7zLxKjM2SMl3eDo3dq6SfGEMEVS8mLkIatYt8O8WPyBqrFX0HSt16qbuhpzexSfzPQirtm8MTe5Um_gebEtuki1Cp17w8kX9HDgUrqGRV3Ha-y5XtqmhRE6k562jm_yg_D7MHWRgvuwzUsP1YEEfYHxGOQAZ0syY8qS_VbtfFsY=w1041-h1850-no
 
ALL my experiences with PML motor tube is that all the ones I have been involved with helping build have been too tight for the motor casing and we ended up laboriously sanding the inside of each

the tubes were fine before gluing into the rockets, they shrink at each glue seam
I cannot tell you how many wasted hours that was, MANY

I am a big fan of the new blue tube and will use it for any rocket that I design which so far have been 9, 2 4", 2 3", 2 2.5", 2 2", 2 1.5" and 1 1"

here are the 4 and 3"
the 4" have been up on full K to 7K feet, I have a mid L to burn when the wind is right


VNfCqli1xigpPoYZyjGEVtXVUVi08RwY6hmDGj7UN19LIRqkImGBibisOS1eErpRkmzWkUBf_iytnd4Nn2Hyyaq8l1T2FINO2e-db1io21pfiwOYe35FVH4KgNi-jIBmE49zuI41OGvjcke8krbBEVoSmGxbG9Nb1h2L5z8UFXG-aky57hE9lW5fiQcP5gbZmKNZ1sZWUJPn9sYwGBZm9ppS7N0VF_Jy2z0SOS1BCTlhsEvHGnDCwDQjT3MtCRzMwReBYFY6eTXOAkrVwG74sOp0pIkTLWQfsMEhtiEU0UW-qTy4oKKQc4KurDhiz8IFIabSPGVcwdZccgNvF_iJ_tBxOWsrpPc-kPr55Ydo7viJFU8vOVNN3EnGVuBPDbGVpEnWXXA_xhCIAQnzO6U9HzXTxvlrRTtHBlttNysL51N-ucgpFj9KJX8yX1k3A0nHz3UPcICi-lAYJNXwTHsKxcnYG-gxduY9Tul4-_OL7Tsn3tCiZ4_X7zLxKjM2SMl3eDo3dq6SfGEMEVS8mLkIatYt8O8WPyBqrFX0HSt16qbuhpzexSfzPQirtm8MTe5Um_gebEtuki1Cp17w8kX9HDgUrqGRV3Ha-y5XtqmhRE6k562jm_yg_D7MHWRgvuwzUsP1YEEfYHxGOQAZ0syY8qS_VbtfFsY=w1041-h1850-no

I think you must be thinking of something else. PML phenolic is waterproof and very temperature stable. I have lots of it in many rockets and have never had any issues with CTI, AT, AMW, or Loki cases. The only problem is brittleness which makes it less suitable for a body tube.
Now a kraft paper cardboard tube will get rings when used with a wood glue, but PML phenolic with epoxy never changes.
 
ALL my experiences with PML motor tube is that all the ones I have been involved with helping build have been too tight for the motor casing and we ended up laboriously sanding the inside of each

the tubes were fine before gluing into the rockets, they shrink at each glue seam
I cannot tell you how many wasted hours that was, MANY

Thank you for the "Heads-Up" . . . I had never heard about a shrinkage problem with PML Phenolic tubing before !

Dave F.
 
I think you must be thinking of something else. PML phenolic is waterproof and very temperature stable. I have lots of it in many rockets and have never had any issues with CTI, AT, AMW, or Loki cases. The only problem is brittleness which makes it less suitable for a body tube.
Now a kraft paper cardboard tube will get rings when used with a wood glue, but PML phenolic with epoxy never changes.

OK . . . Now, I'm confused - LOL !

Does PML phenolic remain stable or not ?

Dave F.
 
all the tubes we used had PML written on the inside
and they did shrink, AT 98mm motor would not fit, bound up at each centering ring and had to be sanded with a cylinder hone
we had to fabricate an extension to get past 36"

we did not have possession of the casing until the night before the launch and had to locate a cylinder hone and I would guess 3-4 hours of work to open it up

TubePhenolic.jpg
 
all of the 54mm motor tubes fit perfectly, it was the 98mm and that had to hold the M1939
 
taking turns honing

upload_2019-5-9_15-25-34.png

motors loaded

upload_2019-5-9_15-26-17.png


the whole crew


upload_2019-5-9_15-27-9.png

launch

upload_2019-5-9_15-29-12.png

upload_2019-5-9_15-29-36.png


upload_2019-5-9_15-29-58.png


upload_2019-5-9_15-30-27.png



upload_2019-5-9_15-30-59.png


recovery

upload_2019-5-9_15-31-48.png
 
Last edited:
now it could very well be since we made the rocket in 95-96 that PML has changed the tube formulation after that just like Blue Tube has changed
 
now it could very well be since we made the rocket in 95-96 that PML has changed the tube formulation after that just like Blue Tube has changed

That certainly could be. One of the things I like best about PML is how stable their tubes are, but I didn’t start until 2000. I’ve never seen one warp in any way. How tight were the centering rings? The pyramid/triangle inside is certainly their logo (the superstitious part of me points it upward.)

I’ve definitely seen cardboard tubes with wood glue get rings and I’ve seen drips of unseen epoxy inside tubes make life very miserable.
 
centering rings were made of fiberglass over nomex honeycomb and not tight at all as you can see, they were glassed around each side after this was taken

upload_2019-5-9_17-17-56.png
 
I didn't provide enough background information before . . .

I've been in Rocketry for over 50 years ( 1967 ) and HPR for 31 years ( legally ), so I didn't feel the need for a lot of extraneous details in my post.

JB Weld will only be used for bonding and filleting all components that will be directly attached to the Motor Mount Tube ( Fin Can ) . . . Fins & Centering Rings.

All other bonding will use either RocketPoxy ( internal & external fillets ) or a slow-setting epoxy for maximum strength.

The "jury is still out" on glassing the airframe, as the flight will be sub-transonic with a very "gentle" motor ( AT M650 Moonburner ).

Dave F.

Most of my LOC stuff I bought from Wildman Rocketry as he stocks the components and many other items ...one stop shopping for me.

I still reach for the LOC MMTs or tubes to make my own longer mmts or Class 1 fun. I like a single wrap of fg as it is still lighter than fw fg and bluetube , but gives the tube some elasticity - if it falls over or takes a hit ..it is less likely to crimp. Also it is much easier for me to slot if wrapped .

Just starting to play with BMS tubes .. they have full length couplers and bluetube full length couplers - but they lack the bigger mmts .

Kenny
 
Most of my LOC stuff I bought from Wildman Rocketry as he stocks the components and many other items ...one stop shopping for me.

I still reach for the LOC MMTs or tubes to make my own longer mmts or Class 1 fun. I like a single wrap of fg as it is still lighter than fw fg and bluetube , but gives the tube some elasticity - if it falls over or takes a hit ..it is less likely to crimp. Also it is much easier for me to slot if wrapped .

Just starting to play with BMS tubes .. they have full length couplers and bluetube full length couplers - but they lack the bigger mmts .

Kenny

Unless BMS has changed their offerings basically their tubes are the equivalent of Estes, and some Aerotech sizes with a few Quest/Centuri sizes. BMS used to carry Blue Tube but I haven't seen them listed on Balsa Machinings site for a couple of years (unless Bill has his new site up and running).
 
centering rings were made of fiberglass over nomex honeycomb and not tight at all as you can see, they were glassed around each side after this was taken

In that picture it appears as though there’s a piece of phenolic coupler inserted into a piece of phenolic tubing. The construction of centering rings from Nomex honeycomb covered by glass cloth is something I have not done. It’s a great technique for managing mass. I can’t imagine why that would cause a constriction about the motor mount tube, though. I don’t know what happened, but this is the only time I have ever heard of PML motor mount tubing changing dimensions. Now, Quantum Tube is a different story. It changes enough due to temperature that fitting a piston to slide easily sometimes requires last minute sanding of a phenolic piston right before flight.
 
Back
Top