Just from looking at ThrustCurve, it seems it's driven by a SQL database. This makes it organized and searchable, free of clutter and opinions. If only NAR/TRA/CAR certification reps were granted access to the additional field, they would be posting documented issues that are traceable and verifiable.
If this was done as a thread or sub-forum here, it would be full of stories and rumors with no accountability. We're talking about lawndarts and other dangerous potentials, so I don't want chatter or potty-mouthing.
Depending on how ThrustCurve is implemented, since a NOTAM filing would be to a specific motor, the database could fire off a notification to the manufacturer. I'm sure TRA/NAR does something like that, but this is (a) redundancy, and (b) a legal positive.
The issue of attorneys is real. My wife is an attorney for the CA AG so I see a lot of things. There is some issue of liability for misuse of the system, but I believe it's overriden by two facts. The posters are personally authorized by NAR/TRA, and the public benefit outweighs the potential for misinformation. Courts do a "balance of justice" test when there are competing motivations. Here, with the right safeguards, mfr notification and public safety benefits, I believe any litigation from disputed entries would lose, perhaps in an MSJ.
On another note, geez Louise, who came up with this OR file? My goodness, the NC weight and dimensions were wrong, as was the BT, and the fins weren't the right size. When all the mods are made, it's now showing 0.99 - 1.05 cals stability with an empty mass of 550g. Better sims, too. Here's the file, but I'm done with it until I can measure the Smoke.
View attachment Estes Nike Smoke v3.ork