shreadvector
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2009
- Messages
- 9,066
- Reaction score
- 254
The Dixon mini E motors from the 1970's were just over .5 inches in diameter and used a Bates grain. They were long - I think they were about 4 to 6 inches long. They fit into a CMR RB-52 tube which slides over an RB-50 or Estes BT-5 tube. They were an Eforty-something.
Something in 18mm and the length of the AVI gold series motors could have held a full E with composite propellant. Think of the Estes E casing being longer thn the Estes D casing in 24mm diamter. The AVI Gold series motors were black powder and were longer. The new Estes E12 will be very similar to the old AVI E11.8 (they used silly decimal point precision average thrust numbers to make you thik they were super premium motors).
Something in 18mm and the length of the AVI gold series motors could have held a full E with composite propellant. Think of the Estes E casing being longer thn the Estes D casing in 24mm diamter. The AVI Gold series motors were black powder and were longer. The new Estes E12 will be very similar to the old AVI E11.8 (they used silly decimal point precision average thrust numbers to make you thik they were super premium motors).
And, the reason it was barely an E, and only available in a short delay, was simple: they simply put a bit more propellant in the space where the longer delay would have gone. I know that they were trying to maintain size compatibility with the 18mm Estes motors, but I would have loved for AT to have come out with a double-long 18mm casing, with a couple of loads for it.
An 18mm full E (or minimal F) would have been freaking COOL! Can you say BT-20 Machbuster?
Hmmmm.... neglecting erosive effects (which you can't in such a long, thin reload, but still), if you increased the nozzle throat to about 1.4 times the original diameter, and simply used two of the grains that would have gone into the D13W or D24T reloads, you'd have roughly an E26W and an E48T.
In reality, to keep erosivity from completely killing you, you'd probably have to at least double the nozzle diameters to keep the Kn under some control. You'd probably also have to switch from a C-slot to a BATES grain geometry, with stepped core diameters (smaller near the top) to keep supersonic flow from tearing the lower grain to pieces. Still, it'd be a cool motor!