Quantcast

Ultimate Deuce!

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

jetra2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2009
Messages
2,795
Reaction score
2
I found this picture looking at pictures of rocket drones for "inspiration" and couldn't resist posting it! It is AWESOME!

Jason
 

Ryan S.

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2003
Messages
3,553
Reaction score
0
I saw that just the other day, man those motors are putting out alot of smoke. It does look just like a deuce smoke trail though! :D
 

Neil

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2011
Messages
2,832
Reaction score
0
That is TOO COOL! Man... Wouldent it be fun to watch one of those things... Is there a video where you found that?
 

Micromeister

Micro Craftman/ClusterNut
TRF Lifetime Supporter
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
15,074
Reaction score
38
Location
Washington DC
OK guys & gals:
That's a Great 0 length launcher test lift-off photo, can any of you "Name that Rocket"? Hint it's a missile:)
 

Micromeister

Micro Craftman/ClusterNut
TRF Lifetime Supporter
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
15,074
Reaction score
38
Location
Washington DC
Keep guessing, no one has it so far!

Hint #2: It is not an Air Force missile.
 

Neil

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2011
Messages
2,832
Reaction score
0
That funny Navy target drone.... Ill go look up the name.:D
 

Micromeister

Micro Craftman/ClusterNut
TRF Lifetime Supporter
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
15,074
Reaction score
38
Location
Washington DC
Nope It's not a drone!
Hint #3:
Don't let the Red test color throw you..
 

Neil

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2011
Messages
2,832
Reaction score
0
Oh... Man... I think I might know.... Is it one of the Armys (or navys, i forget) first cruise missiles? Ill keep looking for the name and/or a pic.:rolleyes:
 

WiK

Site Admin
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
2,645
Reaction score
0
Definitly looks like a cruise missile...
 

Neil

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2011
Messages
2,832
Reaction score
0
SSM-N-8 (RGM-6A)Heres the link!


OK. What did I win?

MORE nuke warheads.... W-5 nuclear fission (40 kT) and, after 1958, it could have a W-27 thermonuclear warhead (2 MT). EEK!:eek:
 

Micromeister

Micro Craftman/ClusterNut
TRF Lifetime Supporter
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
15,074
Reaction score
38
Location
Washington DC
Excellent Works Neil!
You have found em! SSN-N-8 Regulus-I ship or sub launched cruise missile!
Heres another pretty neat shot of one of the early Test RED rounds
 

Micromeister

Micro Craftman/ClusterNut
TRF Lifetime Supporter
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
15,074
Reaction score
38
Location
Washington DC
and a liftoff shot of it's better known successor Regulus-II
 

Neil

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2011
Messages
2,832
Reaction score
0
thankyou, thankyou, thankyouverymuch!:D :cool:

What is my prize?;) :D A REAL Regulus?:cool: :D :D
 

wwattles

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
2,870
Reaction score
0
That launch reminds me of the RATO units used on the C-130's for short take-off fields.

I wonder if you could make a Deuce with motors stacked vertically... like a double deuce or something...
 

Neil

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2011
Messages
2,832
Reaction score
0
I wonder if you could CHAD stage a duece.... Theres an idea....:cool:
 

WiK

Site Admin
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
2,645
Reaction score
0
I beleive thats already been done. It was someone on here...
 

Ryan S.

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2003
Messages
3,553
Reaction score
0
we were just talking about the C130 in another post, interesting.

that is one big cruise missile, but I bet it doesnt have the accuracy of todays
 

BlueNinja

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
2,700
Reaction score
1
Very sweet missile, but the website says it was easily shot down. Do I understand correctly, it had a conventional jet engine inside?
 

Micromeister

Micro Craftman/ClusterNut
TRF Lifetime Supporter
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
15,074
Reaction score
38
Location
Washington DC
Regulus-I was one the the navy's first ship and sub based cruise missiles. yes is was a standard jet motor as are most if not all the cruise missiles of today...Rocket boosted, jet JP-1 fueled sustainers engines.
Like most things the originals.. are usually Big bulky slow things, that get smaller and faster as the tech improves.
Look at the USAF hounddog it's a very streamlined missile strapped to a HUGE HONKIN Jet engine. really funny if you think about it:D
 

Neil

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2011
Messages
2,832
Reaction score
0
Why not just use the rocket engine in the missile:confused: :confused: :confused:
 

WiK

Site Admin
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
2,645
Reaction score
0
LoL :D


Reminds me of this german "missile" I saw on a documentary. They basically thought: "Hey, lets strap a rocket motor to the top of a bomb, and launch it from an 88mm gun rail" :rolleyes:


Alot of the german missile prototypes in WW2 had "Deuce style" rocket boosters, like on this cruise missile. One of them even had 4 :eek:
 

WiK

Site Admin
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
2,645
Reaction score
0
Because a cruise missile is designed to be able to travel llooonngg distances, and a rocket motor isnt the sort of thing to do that. And if there was a rocket motor that could burn for however long a cruise missile is propelled for, the missile would probably go too fast and disentergrate (sp?)... The rocket motors on 'em are just to get it up in the air so the jet can take over.
 

Neil

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2011
Messages
2,832
Reaction score
0
That makes sense:rolleyes: but if you launched it at the right angle.....:D
 

WiK

Site Admin
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
2,645
Reaction score
0
It would be a Ballistic missile instead of a cruise missile...
 

Neil

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2011
Messages
2,832
Reaction score
0
I know. My point is, why have cruise missiles when you got ballistic ones?:confused: I suppose they are still handy in precise attacks....:rolleyes:
 

WiK

Site Admin
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
2,645
Reaction score
0
Erm... Im not sure about this but are they cheaper?
Maybe because cruise missiles are easier to deal with for polotics or something. Ie, We have launched 300 tomahawks at you capital city. You have around half hour till impact to take shelter. With a ballistic missile: We have launched 300 ballistic missiles at your capital city. You have 2 minutes to take cover.

Cruise Missiles are certainly more precise then ballistic ones.

Warfare has changed alot in the last 100 years...
 

Ryan S.

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2003
Messages
3,553
Reaction score
0
there are many reasons, cruise missiles can attack one target extremely accuratly from long distances. ICBMs are more expensive and are not as accurate and they have like 10 warheads, which are nukeclear.

you use cruise missiles "without the fuss of mass destruction"
 
Top