I would say never trust manufacture's motor data. If you can't use real current data, at least use test data from an independent source, such as NAR S&T.
Well , Most manufactures post their results from TMT or S&T.
I would say never trust manufacture's motor data. If you can't use real current data, at least use test data from an independent source, such as NAR S&T.
What's it like painting with the "high output tip" on the Rustoleum Professional? I already find that the 2x nozzles throw a pretty heavy spray.
Estes F15 motors come 2 per pack so you probably should buy 2 kits, or maybe 3 so you'll still have one left after you run out of motors.I want to buy one but I would like to buy it and the Goblin Max at the same time.
You could always build one with a 24mm engine mount. I am a big fan of vertically long fins, my Vapors have never needed a fin repair and I can't say that about any other rocket I've built.Estes F15 motors come 2 per pack so you probably should buy 2 kits, or maybe 3 so you'll still have one left after you run out of motors.
I have had good results with the Rusto Professional. You can get a good gloss coat in one outing. I typically do 2 base coats then the final wet coat all at once. You still need good surface preparation, I use a white primer like the Rusto 2x then sand to 600 grit. The paint is pretty good at filling any tiny scratches. One thing is to give it several days to completely cure before applying decals or taping for a second color.What's it like painting with the "high output tip" on the Rustoleum Professional? I already find that the 2x nozzles throw a pretty heavy spray.
Painting is becoming a real pain in the butt these days. I've had horrible luck with Rusto so I recommend that everybody stay away from it. I've been trying Ace Hardware paint these days with reasonably good luck.I sprayed with a brand new can of Rusto Pro yesterday. It spit blobs of paint onto the rocket intermittently. Metallic, too, so no real way to save or blend it. Very annoying.
Painting is becoming a real pain in the butt these days.
Interesting indeed, and I found it a bit surprising. Epoxy is 100% solids; no solvent evaporating, so every bit that goes on the rocket remains there. Titebond, or any other wood/white glue, contains water that evaporates during hardening/cure. I would have thought that the evaporation would lower the weight of the TB. I was wrong.Not sure you all are ready for this, please sit down and take a deep breath. The booster built with thickened epoxy:
Yup, one gram lighter.
I suspect that if wood glue was applied until the volume of the fillet appeared to be similar to that of the epoxy fillets, the difference in weight would be even greater.
@Theory Let me know when you want to launch that and remind me to bring the club's Walston along. That small tx should fit just fine in there.
Nobody has used the Walston in years so I've usually left it home. Be fun to try some more RDF again. It's been years.
You can still make "equivalent product" . . . Just substitute thin, stranded wire for the "central support". If you sheathe it with close-fitting ( "un-shrunk" ) heat-shrink tube, the burn is instantaneous !Back in the late 80s and early 90s composite to BP staging was easy due to the available product back then that is not now.
There has been no "discussion" . . . It was simply a "reference source" meant to support Art Upton's post, not intended to spark discussion or debate.request we move the "homemade thermalite" discussion to a new thread
They are complete and ready to fly!!!
View attachment 595797
View attachment 595798
View attachment 595799
View attachment 595800
View attachment 595801
Enter your email address to join: