gpoehlein
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2009
- Messages
- 3,564
- Reaction score
- 13
I finally picked up this month's issue of Smithsonian Air & Space magazine, and I'm sure glad I did - There is a nice 5-page article in the April/May issue called Retro Rocketeers. Basically, five of the Apollo era "old guys" (including John Young and Vance Brand) were pulled together to discuss reviving the use of the Apollo capsule. Their conclusion: even with upgrades and a complete redesign, the technology of the Apollo CM/SM package is cheaper, simpler, more reliable, and safer than any winged orbiter, and is a lot more versatile.
They noted the capsule could be scaled up 5-8% and could carry up to 7 people back to earth as a life-boat. If done correctly, the capsule could be re-used multiple times aboard expendable rockets to get to orbit and back. They even decided that the Apollo could be easily adapted for dry landings ala Soyuz.
Very nice article - pick it up while it is still on the stands. Gee - who here wouldn't give their eye teeth to see a Saturn 1/Saturn V launch again?
Greg
They noted the capsule could be scaled up 5-8% and could carry up to 7 people back to earth as a life-boat. If done correctly, the capsule could be re-used multiple times aboard expendable rockets to get to orbit and back. They even decided that the Apollo could be easily adapted for dry landings ala Soyuz.
Very nice article - pick it up while it is still on the stands. Gee - who here wouldn't give their eye teeth to see a Saturn 1/Saturn V launch again?
Greg