Semi-scale SS-20 Saber / RSD-10 Pioneer IRBM

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
The second main charge ejection test was also successful.

The first test (not shown here) was almost double what is shown here. That turned out to be...unnecessarily energetic.
 

Attachments

  • PXL_20230620_234603321.mp4
    26.1 MB
Last edited:
Here are a couple frames from that main charge ejection test. These show the fun effect of combustion products erupting from the vent and shear pin holes.
 

Attachments

  • main ejection 1.png
    main ejection 1.png
    2.2 MB · Views: 0
  • main ejection 2.png
    main ejection 2.png
    2.1 MB · Views: 0
Here are a couple frames from that main charge ejection test. These show the fun effect of combustion products erupting from the vent and shear pin holes.
I don't know how I never saw this thread. WOW! Awesome and I mean that in the literal sense: Awe Inspiring!
 
18 months after this thread was started and I still can't get over what an insane piece of work that is. Seeing one of the... uh... "noses" eject like that just reminds me of it again.

Great work.
Thank you! It's been a long, slow process (starting more than 3 years ago) but is now getting very close to completion.
 
Planning on a 98mm Aerotech N2000W for this thing. This was my first experience building a motor that requires gluing the propellant grains into the liner. That part of the assembly process was...stressful. Definitely a good idea to have extra hands in the mix. Otherwise it could have gone quite poorly.
 

Attachments

  • 20230930_165407.jpg
    20230930_165407.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 0
  • 20231001_083854.jpg
    20231001_083854.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 0
The launch tube is attached to a ladder-like frame made out of 1515 aluminum (the tube is bolted to the frame at the bottom and strapped at several points along its length). The whole launch tube/frame (which weighs 89 lbs) can then be attached to a standard 1515 launch rail.

Today we tested the process with a short launch rail surrogate. For the actual launch the attachment will be done in horizontal position.

For an actual launch, the sequence will be: (1) slide launch tube/frame onto horizontal launch rail; (2) bolt frame to launch rail; (3) place sabots around rocket; (4) slide rocket with sabots into tube, tail end first, until the booster rests against a stopper at the base of the tube; (5) adjust rotation of rocket in tube as necessary so that the flight computer push buttons align with access holes in launch tube; (6) raise the launch rail and proceed with normal launch procedures.
 

Attachments

  • 20231124_122900.jpg
    20231124_122900.jpg
    2.1 MB · Views: 0
  • 20231124_123756.jpg
    20231124_123756.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 0
  • 20231124_123926.jpg
    20231124_123926.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 0
  • 20231124_124118.jpg
    20231124_124118.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 0
Successful launch this weekend! Well, mostly successful. One of the eight grid fins failed to rotate down, and as the motor thrust ramped down the rocket rolled onto its side and found its true ballistic roots.

Despite the horizontal flight and one cartwheel (which may have resulted from that fin eventually folding down into position?), all five parachutes deployed as planned and we recovered all components with no unplanned damage. I say no "unplanned" damage because of expected damage to the three grid fins on the side that the booster laid down on at landing. Replacement grid fins can be simply bolted back onto the airframe.
 

Attachments

  • GX030004_zoom 0.jpg
    GX030004_zoom 0.jpg
    203.8 KB · Views: 0
  • GX030004_zoom 1.jpg
    GX030004_zoom 1.jpg
    206.2 KB · Views: 0
  • GX030004_zoom 2.jpg
    GX030004_zoom 2.jpg
    202.4 KB · Views: 0
  • GX030004_zoom 3.jpg
    GX030004_zoom 3.jpg
    254.5 KB · Views: 0
  • GX030004_zoom 4.jpg
    GX030004_zoom 4.jpg
    222.3 KB · Views: 0
  • GX030004_zoom 5.jpg
    GX030004_zoom 5.jpg
    301.1 KB · Views: 0
  • GX030004_zoom 6.jpg
    GX030004_zoom 6.jpg
    378.6 KB · Views: 0
  • GX030004_zoom 7.jpg
    GX030004_zoom 7.jpg
    46.9 KB · Views: 0
  • GX030004_zoom 8.jpg
    GX030004_zoom 8.jpg
    52.8 KB · Views: 0
  • GX030004_zoom 9.jpg
    GX030004_zoom 9.jpg
    7.4 KB · Views: 0
In zoomed-in video frames you can see the fin that failed to rotate down into position.
 

Attachments

  • GX030004_high zoom 1.jpg
    GX030004_high zoom 1.jpg
    17 KB · Views: 0
  • GX030004_high zoom 2.jpg
    GX030004_high zoom 2.jpg
    30.6 KB · Views: 0
  • GX030004_high zoom 3.jpg
    GX030004_high zoom 3.jpg
    13.6 KB · Views: 0
  • GX030004_high zoom 4.jpg
    GX030004_high zoom 4.jpg
    9.1 KB · Views: 0
  • GX030004_high zoom 5.jpg
    GX030004_high zoom 5.jpg
    6.3 KB · Views: 0
  • GX030004_high zoom 6.jpg
    GX030004_high zoom 6.jpg
    4.3 KB · Views: 0
All five components successfully recovered.
 

Attachments

  • 20231216_155803.jpg
    20231216_155803.jpg
    3.9 MB · Views: 0
  • 20231216_155255.jpg
    20231216_155255.jpg
    4.3 MB · Views: 0
  • 20231216_155715.jpg
    20231216_155715.jpg
    3.5 MB · Views: 0
  • 20231216_155621.jpg
    20231216_155621.jpg
    6.2 MB · Views: 0
  • 20231216_155553.jpg
    20231216_155553.jpg
    4.4 MB · Views: 0

Latest posts

Back
Top