AfterBurners
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 8, 2012
- Messages
- 7,962
- Reaction score
- 526
I was thinking about scratch building a B2 wing bomber and was wondering if the design itself would even be remotely stable?
Help Support The Rocketry Forum:
I would think so. Estes Astron Sky Dart II is on clearance sale right now and is close to it.
Would be a good base to start with.
Would be a good base to start with.
Woody, I think you're thinking of the B1.
The real B2 isn't even stable without its computers monitoring everything, so there's no way it would be stable in a passive configuration. However, you could do a clear extended airframe forward of the wing with some noseweight. You might need some clear vertical stabilizers as well.
-Ken
The real B2 isn't even stable without its computers monitoring everything, so there's no way it would be stable in a passive configuration. However, you could do a clear extended airframe forward of the wing with some noseweight. You might need some clear vertical stabilizers as well.
-Ken
Ditto Ken:
the B2 would likely need some sort of Forward pod similar to the one used with the Enterprise or the Tie Fighter.
TangoJuliet
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2016
- Messages
- 1,239
- Reaction score
- 9
I'm a former B-2 Crew Chief, and as stated, without the computers, it would be unstable. The CG range is very narrow and fuel is constantly transferred between tanks to maintain CG. It doesn't mean a flying wing can't be done without computer assistance though. There are some R/C sailplanes that are essentially flying wings and they fly exceptionally well.
TheTellurian
In space no one can hear you fart
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2009
- Messages
- 335
- Reaction score
- 12
https://www.bananahobby.com/6-ch-blitzrcworks-b-2-spirit-stealth-bomber-rc-edf-jet-arf.html
https://www.generalhobby.com/stealth-bomber-dual-64mm-with-retracts-version-p-815.html
https://www.toysrus.com/buy/airplanes-helicopters/b2-spirit-remote-control-plane-44070-67074606
https://www.trendtimes.com/b2stborcpl.html
https://www.surreymodels.com/b2-spirit-8ch/
https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/sho...Bomber-Twin-EDF!-PICS-UP!!-In-Production-Now!
These guys worked it out and I've seen more in the past. Notice no ugly pods to spoil the lines.
Richard
https://www.generalhobby.com/stealth-bomber-dual-64mm-with-retracts-version-p-815.html
https://www.toysrus.com/buy/airplanes-helicopters/b2-spirit-remote-control-plane-44070-67074606
https://www.trendtimes.com/b2stborcpl.html
https://www.surreymodels.com/b2-spirit-8ch/
https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/sho...Bomber-Twin-EDF!-PICS-UP!!-In-Production-Now!
These guys worked it out and I've seen more in the past. Notice no ugly pods to spoil the lines.
Richard
However, airplane CG/CP relationship is not the same as what's required for a stable rocket flight.
-Ken
Yeup, my mistake.
I was thinking of the B1.
B2 is basically the upgraded Northrup Flying Wing.
But the B1 wouldn't be a bad build either...
I was thinking of the B1.
B2 is basically the upgraded Northrup Flying Wing.
But the B1 wouldn't be a bad build either...
TheTellurian
In space no one can hear you fart
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2009
- Messages
- 335
- Reaction score
- 12
CG in both cases needs to be ahead of the CP. In a rocket the farther ahead the better as it is only concerned with up and down, in an airplane the CG must be just ahead of the CP also known as the AC or aerodynamic center, basically the center of lift. Its a balancing act with aircraft since they fly horizontally, basically the the plane balances on the wings AC and the CG must be balanced by the tail elevator or elevons. Many flying wings have had rocket motors added and have flown well provided the CG is not shifted out side the acceptable stable range if shifted at all. Examples can be found in the Rocket Boost Glider forum.
AfterBurners I say go for it!
Richard
Building and flying a B1 as a model rocket is very doable. Just need that beautiful five motor cluster to light all at once. Consider flying it with the landing gear down, don't be afraid of nose weight. Swept position on the wings is better but forward will work too, just depends on how you want it to look.
I have flown the B-58 three times now and that has six motors.
With some experience the WING WILL FLY LIKE A ROCKET TOO!
I have flown the B-58 three times now and that has six motors.
With some experience the WING WILL FLY LIKE A ROCKET TOO!
The B2 would be just a bit trickier than this one, but very doable.
I saw a plastic model B1 in the hobby store case. Looks like a 24mm could maybe fit in the jets. PMC? Get out the Dremel!
But it says in the book that widely spaced motors are a bad design
Like an XB 70 with a six pack. Scratch built or PMC bombers are Crazy!
But it says in the book that widely spaced motors are a bad design
Like an XB 70 with a six pack. Scratch built or PMC bombers are Crazy!
TheTellurian
In space no one can hear you fart
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2009
- Messages
- 335
- Reaction score
- 12
A failure to ignite one will cause a pinwheel is the why. Uneven thrust can cause thrust vectoring of the model. If your certain of your clustering skills have at it. [in a safe space ]
Richard
]Richard
I had a pinwheel with the B-58 and a few others and it is not that bad - in a safe space. They will land near the pad. The worst is to launch in too much wind and have them arc over and go airplane.
For a B 2 I wonder if you could use colorful, wing tip "Vapor Trail" streamers to bring the CP back on the wing with a ton of centered nose weight. It has worked on a Space 1999 Eagle I launched and flew horizontally. But a similar B 2 with widely spaced motors would be quite crazy but fun.
For a B 2 I wonder if you could use colorful, wing tip "Vapor Trail" streamers to bring the CP back on the wing with a ton of centered nose weight. It has worked on a Space 1999 Eagle I launched and flew horizontally. But a similar B 2 with widely spaced motors would be quite crazy but fun.
