Perhaps just a past clash of naming standards? There is that "H" in the 29mm motor mount names. The BMS stuff is correct in OpenRocket, BTW.Hmm.
At the BMS website, they list BT-52H as 29mm motor mount:
View attachment 610106
However, in the OpenRocket parts database, BT52 is listed with very different dimensions (quite a bit smaller)
View attachment 610108
Something is amiss.
The H usually just means heavy-wall; ID should be the same between regular and H variety. Whatever is going on here it is weird.Perhaps just a past clash of naming standards? There is that "H" in the 29mm motor mount names. The BMS stuff is correct in OpenRocket, BTW.
Agreed.The H usually just means heavy-wall; ID should be the same between regular and H variety. Whatever is going on here it is weird.
I've flown mine twice so far — once E16 to E16 (https://flightsketch.com/flights/4133/) and once F15 to F15 (https://flightsketch.com/flights/4135/). Had an Eggfinder (the regular one, not the Mini) in the payload section. I also added a big reflective streamer. It landed in sight both flights....of course.Definitely a very cool design. What kind of trackers are being used with this kit (unless you consider it a single use model, lol).
Not going to lie...I was impressed by that...A club member launched one yesterday and recovered both sections intact.
Enter your email address to join: