Well I will keep to cti thank you
Well I will keep to cti thank you
I will stick to motors I put together so I can make sure the innards are all right.
A labeling issue could have problems all the same if it were reloads - a person might not realize its a different propellant than the label states. I too agree that this information should have been released far and wide immediately. I have a couple of these loads, what's in them?
I would realize (at least with AT), since I've seen them all except for Propellant X.
Well I will keep to cti thank you
I would realize (at least with AT), since I've seen them all except for Propellant X.
Or they can send them out to the west coast because we fly on lake beds where the closest flammable material is a few miles away
+5 on that! Of course, we'll need those at a steep discount since we are providing a valuable hazmat solution to the vendor and manufacturer....right???...
Or they can send them out to the west coast because we fly on lake beds where the closest flammable material is a few miles away
Wow.
On Sunday, I had a spectacular CATO with an H135 -
[YOUTUBE]wdW80nlG2KQ[/YOUTUBE]
...I got back to the Forum and apparently some DMS motors have been decertified...
Was the CATO because of the motor problems leading to the decertification? (Propellant seemed like White Lightning as it should have been, but it's not every day when a rocket CATOs like that.)
Looks like your forward closure let loose. Be sure to let Aerotech know and file a MESS report (if you're NAR).
This doesn't sound like the issue that they had with the other DMS motor, though.
Or they can send them out to the west coast because we fly on lake beds where the closest flammable material is a few miles away
Enter your email address to join: