Nylon leash for a shock cord? Mid-power

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Underdog

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2016
Messages
119
Reaction score
11
Would a dog leash make for a good mid-power shock cord? They have 3/8" and 1/2" wide nylon straps and a hook/clasp. I have notice than many rocket builders are using nylon strapping (Apogee) in their kits now. The webbing/strap seems less likely to zipper the body tube when compared to kevlar cord.
These dog leases are inexpensive and readily available. I would just snap the clasp to the eye bolt onto the bulkhead/baffle and avoid the need to learn to tie those difficult knots.
dog leash.JPG
 
English Mastiff is over 200 lbs. If he suddenly took off after a squirrel in the park (down an extremely steep hill), there'd be some kind of force on the leash if I didn't let go.

mastiff.JPG
 
Would a dog leash make for a good mid-power shock cord?

You are asking a complicated question.

A short answer is that a nylon dog leash is unlikely to be a good solution for a mid power rocket.

Calculating Shock Cord Size and Lengths

A complete answer is a course of instruction in fluid dynamics and materials science.

A terse, insufficient, and disastrously imprecise internet discussion forum hand-wave might go something like this:

The "shock" that the cord is meant to absorb is not force, it is rapidly changing force. Think of your dog running to the end of a slack leash while you stand still -- that jerk on your arm that wrenches joints and snaps tendons is what the separated components of the rocket will experience when the shock cord is fully extended.

An elastic cord will reduce the shock loading (reduce the rate of change of the forces exerted to slow down the separated parts of the rocket after ejection). An elastic with some degree of hysteresis (dampening) will also help to dissipate the energy of the ejection.

Making the shock cord longer gives fluid drag a larger distance over which to do work, dissipating energy. Since shock scales with mass, for rockets with large mass (the heavy rockets that can only be launched on high power motors) it may be impractical to pack a long-enough shock cord for drag-dissipated shock reduction. Likewise, elastic cords may become friable* under large shock loads, so are liable to fail for heavy rockets. For heavy rockets, then, it is sometimes desirable to use an inelastic shock cord and harden the points of attachment against shock failure.

For high power applications, nylon webbing (tubular nylon is favorite) offers some advantages over round cords (notably, you can more easily make a couple of tape-wrapped z-folds to help "absorb" the shock -- and dissipate energy -- with flat straps than your can with round cords). It is also a little easier to manage when packing the recovery harness.

For a rocket that is light enough to go on a G motor, depending upon LOTS of other design factors, nylon webbing may not be necessary or even desirable.

*Friable seems like the wrong word. Maybe "brittle"? Not sure how to describe rupture under tensile shock.
 
Last edited:
For a rocket that is light enough to go on a G motor, depending upon LOTS of other design factors, nylon webbing may not be necessary or even desirable.
.
This is a helpful perspective. With this information, I went back and looked at the Apogie mid power rocket's shock cord it was in fact 'tubular" nylon webbing
and not a dog leash (as I originally mistook to be the case). I my defense, to the untrained eye, it does resemble a dog leash.
I'm concerned that the ejection blast will eventually burn the shock cord, and I have not figured out how I would ever replace it. The cord is attached way down in the body tube. Too far for me to reach the knot, let alone replace it.
tubular.JPG
 
Nylon will eventually burn so many people turn to Kevlar. Both have advantages & disadvantages.
 
I went back and looked at the Apogie mid power rocket's shock cord it was in fact 'tubular" nylon webbing

To what rocket are you referring?

The cord is attached way down in the body tube. Too far for me to reach the knot, let alone replace it.

There are lots of ways to solve that problem. A few instances (not remotely exhaustive):

As timbucktoo says, a Kevlar cord or a Kevlar leader to the shock cord mount will last longer than an all-nylon cord.

Some fliers use sleeves made of Nomex over the first few feet of shock cord. You can also modify the shock cord mount, so that it is accessible from the aft end of the rocket.

Nomex: https://macperformancerocketry.com/...arnesses/products/copy-of-top-flight-recovery

Replaceable Kevlar modification: https://www.apogeerockets.com/education/downloads/Newsletter338.pdf

Consider, also, how many times a rocket might reasonably fly. How many ejections a cord will have to withstand. 4 G-impulse flights will burn about $100 worth of motors. Depending upon whether you are building a collection, or are building for the sake of building, you might be ready to retire the rocket, or part it out for other projects by the time the shock cord fails.
 
To what rocket are you referring?
There are lots of ways to solve that problem.
I was looking at the Zephyr. These are great options for protecting the shock cord. I'm really going to give the replaceable shock cord concept a lot of thought.
I have no idea how long to expect my shock cord or my rocket to last.
I was thinking "forever."
 
Back
Top