Sure... glad to answer...
1) "monkey show"-- the school more interested in driving people into lawsuits over pointless, outdated, and frankly stupid arguments over the dress code and hair length than actually focusing on their job, say EDUCATING THE KIDS! (and then perpetually losing those lawsuits or having to settle and pay off aggrieved parents with money from my school taxes, among others) Elementary teachers more interested in throwing their weight around and 'taking the day off' on field trips gossiping with their fellow teacher's like a girl's slumber party while the kids run wild, rather than DO THEIR JOB and actually supervise the children on field trips-- SO I REFUSE TO DRIVE ELEMENTARY FIELD TRIPS SINCE THE ADMINISTRATION REFUSES TO MAKE THE TEACHERS DO THEIR JOB, and then complains and rolls anything that happens on the BUS DRIVER when the TEACHERS are specifically to maintain order on field trips, per district policies. Administrators that will slam a good kid HARD on first offenses I've written up, yet the PERPETUAL TROUBLEMAKERS that should be in ISS, A-SCHOOL, SUSPENDED, or KICKED OUT
STILL GETTING ASSIGNED LUNCH DETENTION OR OTHER "NON PUNISHMENTS" ON AS MANY AS THE SEVENTH WRITE-UP (personal experience). I could go on for a couple pages with what I've seen of the "monkey show", but you don't want to know anyway, not really-- you want to wave it all off as 'get involved and write your congressman' like that will really change ANYTHING, EVER...
2) In our school district in SE TX near Houston, the eligibility requirements for pre-K are: A) CANNOT speak the English language, B) cannot exceed the income levels as determined by the complicated formulas that restrict eligibility to low-income and welfare cases, C) or identified as a member of a group considered "at risk" (again, welfare cases and minorities)... IN SHORT, IF YOU'RE NOT A MINORITY YOU CANNOT ATTEND PRE-K.
3) No, never said that... there are plenty of responsible single parents. There are plenty of irresponsible "married" parents as well. I'm all for school vouchers, because I've seen the "rotating door" used by many 'bad kids' that are perpetual misbehavior cases who have parents who have been married several times-- they're about to get kicked out of school in the neighboring district, so they come live with their dad, or their mom, or dad's ex-wife, or their auntie, or grandma, or cousin, or stepdad, or former stepmom, or whatever, and get in trouble here until they're about to get kicked out (usually after nearly half a year or so) and then they go to another district down the road on the other side with another 'family' member and do the same thing again. They make it through the year and return to the original district the following fall, since once the new school year starts "all is forgotten" from their previous misbehavior (unless they're kicked out, which is why they go to a different district before getting kicked out) and so they start each new year with a 'clean slate' that they then keep doing the same crap they've always done, floating from district to district. Meanwhile, GOOD kids who happen to have the "misfortune" of a stable home with both parents in the same house cannot choose to attend a better school because TEA (education agency) perpetually strikes down any attempts at school vouchers, because the "good kids" would end up going to a good school, leaving the 'trash' in the sorry schools, and that would make TEA look bad... ESPECIALLY on standardized testing, which IS the be-all end-all of the schools-- LOOKING GOOD NOT BEING GOOD!
4) NO! I'm not saying that at all... WHAT I'M SAYING IS, MY DAUGHTER IS NOT ALLOWED TO ATTEND BECAUSE SHE'S WHITE, SPEAKS ENGLISH, HAS TWO GAINFULLY EMPLOYED RESPONSIBLE PARENTS, AND SHE'S NOT HANDICAPPED OR HAS SOME "CONDITION" OR "DISEASE" PROTECTED BY LAW THAT WOULD ALLOW HER TO GO! Our school system, thanks to limp wristed PC politicians more interested in looking good than being good, IGNORES the best and brightest in our society to PANDER to the lowest and least likely to succeed. THIS IS WRONG! We need to extend EQUAL OPPORTUNITY but this expectation of EQUAL RESULTS is a fantasy... I see it every day-- a LOT of kids (dare I say 'most' but certainly NOT ALL) follow the values espoused by their culture-- IE, if their culture places a high value on education, then they tend to do much better in school. If their culture places low value on education, and places more value on being a cut-up, a bad-@$$, machismo, or other such stupidity, then they do worse in school and spend most of their time honing their "rep" as a cut-up or bad-@$$. I see it every day. Yes, I know that's politically incorrect, racist, whatever you want to call it. I also know FROM PERSONAL EXPERIENCE IN THE MAJORITY OF CASES THAT IS A FACT! Ignoring it accomplishes nothing. My wife has the good fortune to teach Pre-AP (Honors in old parlance) English in high school in a suburban district near Houston (that pays MUCH better than this cow-pasture school district here, which incidentally I attended all 12 years and graduated from) and she's lucky enough that she's teaching MOSTLY PRE-AP KIDS... and most of them are Asian and Indian, two cultures that place a high value on education and push their kids to excel. She ended up with a REGULAR English class on her schedule this year in addition to the PRE-AP classes, and the (predominantly Hispanic and Black) kids are MUCH less motivated, more rowdy and misbehaving, and score lower and have MUCH less interest in doing their work or being successful-- they're there because they get a ticket for skipping school. I see this myself every day on the bus and around the schools.
Sorry if that offends, but I SEE IT WITH MY OWN EYES. It's a sad but unfortunate truth. How to fix it?? I know how but it's not pleasant... we have to re-establish the possibility of FAILURE and STOP PANDERING... it's ENABLING people to get away with their irresponsibility.
My grandmother and I were talking one time when I was in high school-- the teen pregnancy rate was BIG NEWS back in those days-- now it's a given. She asked me "what those girls were thinking" and I commented that they didn't care-- their parents would take care of them and the baby, or they'd get an abortion, and they could get welfare, WIC, free healthcare, free childcare, and a myriad other programs payed by our taxes to take care of them and their illegitimate children, so they didn't care... they did what they wanted and didn't worry about it... NO CONSEQUENCES! My Grandmother commented how, "in my day, we didn't mess around like that-- if you got knocked up, your life was OVER-- NO man worth having would have you, and you would end up living in a dirt floor shack chopping cotton, poor as church mice for the rest of your life!" Harsh medicine, but it's what we need...
You may flame away at me now...
OL JR