Questions about a mach 2 attempt.

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

pendrin2020

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2018
Messages
168
Reaction score
43
So airfest is coming.

I'm already attempting my L3 that weekend, but I kinda want to try something gutsy. I see wildman's got these Mach 2 kits for $90 and I'd like to put one together in time for the event, but I've never flown that fast. So here's a few questions:

Are rail buttons a bad idea if you're going that fast?

I understand that aerodynamics change drastically above mach, is there a baro-based altimeter I can trust for accurate top speed data? If not, anyone know where in the hell I can find a Raven?

What are the big mistakes that every newbie to extreme performance make?
 
Type "Airfest" in the comments and get it for $69.

I dont think rail buttons will effect speed nearly as much as your build weight. I believe it will effect altitude more. Wildman also sell a printed airfoiled rail guide that worked well for me.

Or go with fly away rail guides.
 
As far as baro-based altimeter velocity, speeds at mach tend to get a little funky. Better off with an accelerometer based altimeter.
 
That’s kinda what I’m thinking, but other than the raven, what is there?
 
What if I used baro or timers for recovery and use an Arduino with an accelerometer for data logging?
 
The baro-alt will be flaky through Mach, but you could look at the alt v time curve before and after and get an idea of how fast it had to go in between. Would that be good enough?
 
My baro is close enough over Mach 2 and matches my sims and accelerometer, well close enough. Baro is mostly funky going through Mach but a lot of the noise goes away once you get through it. Using a baro and accelerometer based altimeter would be ideal, but if budget is a concern I would put your money into a tracker. When it comes to the rail buttons I would use a FARG instead.
 
It wasn't quite Mach 2, but the high school club I work with flew to M1.6 on two baro-based altimeters: a Stratologger CF and an Eggtimer Quark. As long as they have Mach lockouts/Mach immunity listed in the features you should be OK with a baro at M2. How high are you going?
 
It wasn't quite Mach 2, but the high school club I work with flew to M1.6 on two baro-based altimeters: a Stratologger CF and an Eggtimer Quark. As long as they have Mach lockouts/Mach immunity listed in the features you should be OK with a baro at M2. How high are you going?

Not sure, still pondering whether or not to commit to the project.
 
For recording only, the Jolly Logic Altimeter 3 has an accelerometer...doesn't it? Would that do the trick?
 
Have flown a Ravens to Mach 1.8 no problems.

One thing I would suggest is gluing the supercap to the PCB (as recommended in the manual). The high accels you will be experiencing during a speed run will rip it off the board otherwise. I use Loctite 401 CA adhesive.

Similarly, if you have a gps just run a thin layer of epoxy around the antenne where it is stuck (by double-sided tape) onto the PCB.
 
Is it known which, if any, altimeters integrate acceleration to get altitude? That would be a double integral with noise to boot.
 
Is it known which, if any, altimeters integrate acceleration to get altitude? That would be a double integral with noise to boot.

And would actually calculate distance travelled instead of altitude. Apogee is usually better determined by barometric and velocity is better determined by accelerometer.
 
Back
Top