That's got me wondering: what if AeroTech made an "H" for the 29/40-120 case? I don't even know if it theoretically possible, as it may be near the end of the volumetric and structural limits of the case. Regardless, I wonder if more would consider an L1 knowing all they needed to do is to get the reload?
Anyway, another interesting feature about the the G138 is that is a progressive thrust curve, whereas most of the other RMS offerings are regressive thrust profiles. I've never seen the G138 in action, but I would like to burn one and find out!
Thanks for the kind props old_dude. :blush:
I'm just building on what others have been doing, like Mark II's helpful links with NAR S&T and ThrustCurve.org (esp. John DeMar). You can DIY these graphs by going to
https://www.rocketryforum.com/showpost.php?p=155698&postcount=13 and downloading the Excel files.
Just for you, here is a thrust curve comparison for the AeroTech "G" class motors, along with their baby "H" offering, so you can see how they stack up with each other.
Greg