G.I. Joe Rocket Launcher

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

n3tjm

Papa Elf
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
8,436
Reaction score
1,923
Location
Penns Creek, PA
Got this from an e-mail sent from my twin brother:

"Another strong contender in our “more dangerous to the pilot” category. This makes me wonder if anyone at Hasbro understands any properties of rocket exhaust other than “orange.”"

GIJoe Rocket.jpg
 
Oh, no danger to the operator of that at all! All he would have to do would be lean a little to the right and duck when he fires off that missile!:rotflol:
 
A CATO would bring a new set of challenges all-together.:lol:
 
You guys are WAY over analyzing this! It's G.I. Joe - he can survive anything!!! LOL!

Next thing you know you'll be bringing up the Coyote and Roadrunner and how a CATO could do the coyote in on the ACME rocket.
 
I'm pretty sure this violates OSHA... and whatever the military equivalent is...

HE'S NOT WEARING HIS SAFETY GOGGLES!!!!

Oh my... :dork::rolleyes: OL JR :)
 
You guys are WAY over analyzing this! It's G.I. Joe - he can survive anything!!!

Except Chuck Norris. After all, a Chuck Norris delivered roundhouse kick is the preferred method of execution in 32 states.
 
Maybe the makers of G.I. Joe just need to find out how the US Army does it with “up close and personal” launched rockets?

The Stinger missile has the power of, something like an L or M rocket motor? Forget safety codes, who in their right mind would want to ignite an engine that powerful right next to their EAR?

Well, the Stinger does not do that. The Stinger is tube-launched, and is two-staged. But the first stage engine is called the “Ejector Motor,” And only has enough power to start the missile forward out of the tube, so that by the time the Stinger leaves the tube, the Ejector Motor has burned out. So, there is no flame that the missile operator (the guy firing it) is exposed to. The Stinger coasts out about 30 feet or so, then its engine ignites. By that point, the guy firing it is not exposed to any dangerous exhaust, other than maybe breathing the smoke (but then WE face that smoke breathing problem all the time).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIM-92_Stinger

Three Stinger missile pics at the bottom of this page, then first 7 pics of the next page:

https://www.redstone.army.mil/history/archives/missiles/missiles0018.html

Here is a pic of a Stinger starting to leave the launch tube, with a lot of smoke out the back of the tube. The “ejector motor” is probably already burned out by this moment:
https://www.redstone.army.mil/history/archives/missiles/stinger_04.jpg

Stinger out of launch tube, coasting, about to ignite in another 10-20 feet
https://www.redstone.army.mil/history/archives/missiles/stinger_02.jpg

The music attached to this video is junk, but at 1:56 and 2:33 into the video you can see the Stinger’s Ejector motor, burned out but with some flame, leaving behind the missile, and the missile ignite it’s own engine 30 feet or so away.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39fv908PT1o

Here is another Youtube video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJBGV2nHf5U&feature=related

At about 24-25 seconds into this one, you can see in slo-motion how the ejector motor fires, to move the missile out of the tube, and the missile leaves the tube without any exhaust burning. The ejector motor itself is not seen leaving the tube. Are about 38 seconds, in a slo-motion replay of a dual Stinger firing ,you can see both missile leave the tube, coasting totally dead, starting to slow down as though they would fall to the ground 50-70 feet away, until each Stinger’s engine ignites.

Ah, found this one on Youtube. It seems to be an actual US Army film to familiarize people how it works:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyrDh2K7b8M&feature=related

At about 2:20 into that video, there is a nice test shot showing the ejector motor being used, plus other footage related to testing to make sure the operator would be safe. Also of course, how the Stinger actually works.

Now actually, for something the size of that GI Joe missile, the short burn ejector motor method would probably not be so well suited. So at the least, the operator would be enclosed in something. The US Army MRLS - Multiple Rocket Launch System comes to mind, the crew is inside of it while the missiles leave the firing rack/tubes mounted on back. Sort of the real-world version with the fireworks cube “Saturn Missile Battery”.

https://www.army-technology.com/projects/mlrs/

I know, it’s only a toy. And something like a MLRS vehicle, big enough for a G.I. Joe to fit inside of, would be sort of big and costly to be a viable G.I. Joe toy.
[edit - I was sort of wrong. Found something the size of an MRLS that was a G.I. Joe toy, even if it is a rolling command center and the missiles are puny. At:
https://www.generalsjoes.com/reviews/2005/vehicles/rocc_1.html
]

BTW - in the “More Dangerous to the Pilot” - real world, really flown category, it is hard to top the German “Natter” vertically launched rocket fighter plane. Which had a 100% kill rate, the acceleration breaking the Natter’s pilot’s neck at launch.

- George Gassaway

stinger_nodate_01.jpg

stinger_04.jpg

stinger_02.jpg

mrls.jpg

natter.jpg
 
Back
Top