Ahh, so calculating caliber is a rule of thumb. Yes, aspect ratio is where my brain goes when considering caliper. With a long enuff BT one could choose a caliber and adjust CG to make it so.1 caliber is defined as 1 body tube diameter. Stability *rule of thumb* is CP is behind CG by at least 1 caliber.
An alternative is to go by percentage of rocket length, where rule of thumb CP behind CG by 10%-20%. Using percentage is a little more adaptable to rockets of different aspect ratios (i.e., long and skinny vs. short and fat). If you're using OpenRocket it'll show stability by calibers and percentage by default, so you can choose.
Again, "caliber" is simply a unit of measurement equal to diameter. 1 caliber is the rule of thumb for acceptable stability margin.Ahh, so calculating caliber is a rule of thumb. Yes, aspect ratio is where my brain goes when considering caliper. With a long enuff BT one could choose a caliber and adjust CG to make it so.
I built a Estes Big Daddy and am unable to achieve a caliber much greater than 0.3 without a lot of extra weight... due in part to adding a bulkhead at the aft end of the NC, greatly shortening the possible arm. With the short arm an affective moment requires a prohibitive amount of weight. Im very reluctant to fly it.
I'm not sure what you're saying here. Moment arm does not factor into stability equation.due in part to adding a bulkhead at the aft end of the NC, greatly shortening the possible arm. With the short arm an affective moment requires a prohibitive amount of weight.
Again, "caliber" is simply a unit of measurement equal to diameter. 1 caliber is the rule of thumb for acceptable stability margin.
Unless you did something really weird the Big Daddy should be stable. What is its stability as a percentage of length?
I'm not sure what you're saying here. Moment arm does not factor into stability equation.
Well, yeah. Gettin into the NC would greatly decrease the weight necessary to move the CG forward to maybe 0.7 caliber, around 20% OAL.Are you saying that your bulkhead attached to the nose cone is going to prevent you from adding nose weight into the tip of the nose cone? If so that is remedied easily enough with a drill (drill hole, insert weight into nose, cover hole). How much weight in the nose would you need to get the move CG forward an inch?
Nope.Well, yeah. Gettin into the NC would greatly decrease the weight necessary to move the CG forward to maybe 0.7 caliber, around 20% OAL.
Maybe I was hoping whining about it would make it happen without me cutting into the NC
I built one not too many years ago. It is built with a D motor length mount and does not require nose weight.Unfortunately I'm not sure if the Big Daddy normally requires nose weight. Did you do anything unusual in your build to make it tail-heavy?
F16 motor.Nope.
A single hole in the bulkhead is not bad, and easy to cover afterwards.
What motor did you use to measure CG?
Enter your email address to join: