Help Support RocketryForum by donating using the link above or becoming a Supporting Member.


Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Join Date
    27th October 2009
    Location
    Brigham City, UT
    Posts
    2,176

    Voyager Fires Thrusters

    Voyager-1 fires the backup thrusters for the first time in 37 years. Talk about long-term reliability!

    https://www.space.com/38967-voyager-...-37-years.html

    Last edited by aerostadt; 2nd December 2017 at 05:58 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    28th January 2009
    Location
    Boise, ID
    Posts
    555
    Quote Originally Posted by aerostadt View Post
    Voyager-1 fires the backup thrusters for the first time in 37 years. Talk about long-term reliability!

    https://www.space.com/38967-voyager-...-37-years.html
    This link worked better for me.


  3. #3
    Join Date
    31st January 2009
    Posts
    4,623
    https://phys.org/news/2017-12-voyage...ers-years.html

    https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=7014

    All of Voyager's thrusters were developed by Aerojet Rocketdyne. The same kind of thruster, called the MR-103, flew on other NASA spacecraft as well, such as Cassini and Dawn.

    Since 2014, engineers have noticed that the thrusters Voyager 1 has been using to orient the spacecraft, called "attitude control thrusters," have been degrading. Over time, the thrusters require more puffs to give off the same amount of energy.

    On Tuesday, Nov. 28, 2017, Voyager engineers fired up the four TCM "trajectory correction maneuver" thrusters for the first time in 37 years and tested their ability to orient the spacecraft using 10-millisecond pulses. The team waited eagerly as the test results traveled through space, taking 19 hours and 35 minutes to reach an antenna in Goldstone, California, that is part of NASA's Deep Space Network.

    Lo and behold, on Wednesday, Nov. 29, they learned the TCM thrusters worked perfectly—and just as well as the attitude control thrusters.

    The plan going forward is to switch to the TCM thrusters in January. To make the change, Voyager has to turn on one heater per thruster, which requires power—a limited resource for the aging mission. When there is no longer enough power to operate the heaters, the team will switch back to the attitude control thrusters.

    The thruster test went so well, the team will likely do a similar test on the TCM thrusters for Voyager 2, the twin spacecraft of Voyager 1. The attitude control thrusters currently used for Voyager 2 are not yet as degraded as Voyager 1's, however.

    "With these thrusters that are still functional after 37 years without use, we will be able to extend the life of the Voyager 1 spacecraft by two to three years," said Suzanne Dodd, project manager for Voyager at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California.
    "I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts." - Will Rogers

    "If you don't read the newspaper, you're uninformed. If you read the newspaper, you're misinformed." - Mark Twain

  4. #4
    Join Date
    23rd January 2009
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    944
    Just came across my phone. Amazing, what's next, an encounter?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    18th January 2009
    Posts
    471
    Quote Originally Posted by aerostadt View Post
    Voyager-1 fires the backup thrusters for the first time in 37 years.
    Backup thrusters? Why does it need to back up, did it make a wrong turn?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    10th July 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    1,267
    The regular Attitude Control Thrusters have been noticed to be degrading over time. They switched to using the TCM thrusters (not normally used for attitude control) because the RTG units are still putting enough energy out to provide heating for those them. In a few years the RTGs will not have enough power and they will switch back to the ACTs and use them, even though they are degrading for some reason. Overall outcome should be mission extended

    If you were an engineer on that project I think you would be very happy to see your hardware still flying after so long
    TRA 13430, Level 3

    "Everybody's simulation model is guilty until proven innocent" (Thomas H. Lawrence 1994)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    18th June 2011
    Location
    Gering, NE
    Posts
    51
    She seems to be fairing better then the 6th probe in the Voyager series. Story from NASA was that one fell into a 'black hole' or somesuch.
    Brandon M. Grasmick

    Too many interests to talk about...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    18th January 2009
    Location
    Virginia - Central
    Posts
    3,999
    Quote Originally Posted by BMG22 View Post
    She seems to be fairing better then the 6th probe in the Voyager series. Story from NASA was that one fell into a 'black hole' or somesuch.
    V'ger

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	voyager  .jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	81.4 KB 
ID:	333389
    We got two categories of pilots around here. We got your prime pilots that get all the hot planes, and we got your pud-knockers who DREAM about getting the hot planes.
    Now what are you two pud-knockers gonna have?... Huh?
    Pancho Barnes-
    The Right Stuff
    http://www.mwavs.com/0053148414/M4RS...udknockers.m4r

    Tripoli #2747

  9. #9
    Join Date
    14th March 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    3,239
    Quote Originally Posted by davel View Post
    Backup thrusters? Why does it need to back up, did it make a wrong turn?
    Yes, it is a male satellite.
    Zeus-cat
    NAR# 92125 L1
    Total Impulse for 2017: 1,493.8 N/s Flights: 56
    2017: 1/2A:0, A:6, B:11, C:2, D:12, E:4, F:1, G: I have NEVER launched a G motor, H:1, I:1

  10. #10
    Join Date
    10th July 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    1,267
    Female. A male would do a handbrake turn.

    TRA 13430, Level 3

    "Everybody's simulation model is guilty until proven innocent" (Thomas H. Lawrence 1994)

Similar Threads

  1. Jet Hitch Thrusters
    By MarkH in forum Propulsion
    Replies: 223
    Last Post: 26th May 2015, 10:15 PM
  2. Using cold-gas thrusters for stabilization?
    By Raketenolli in forum Propulsion
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 20th October 2014, 06:47 PM
  3. Motor Static Fires
    By DPatell in forum Propulsion
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 22nd January 2005, 10:04 AM
  4. miss fires
    By carson in forum Recovery
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 25th June 2004, 02:24 PM
  5. First fires
    By Neil in forum Propulsion
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 29th October 2003, 05:59 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •