Will o-rings be OK on HP reloads that are loaded and stored for months prior to launch?

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

DavieRockets

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2011
Messages
484
Reaction score
12
Due to Covid-19 I have been unable to launch using a CTI L645 that I loaded into its 75mm motor casing many months ago. I'm wondering if the forward and rear closure o-rings will "relax" and take a "set" thereby offering considerably less sealing properties. O rings were greased with synthetic grease. Usually I launch within hours of loading up.
 
Hey there Mr. Lang.. (c'est paul, ton voisin a pointe claire!)

Howe about a message to CTI? to either inquire about their opinion as to the condition after a long wait under pressure, or if they can send you a replacement set..

O-rings are pretty standard, size-wise. if you are worried, and have a set of reload instructions handy, you may be able to get a replacement set from McMaster Carr. (or a set for 10 replacements!) Swap them out before our next launch.. (Which will likely be next year [spring / summer] sometime!)
 
Hey there Mr. Lang.. (c'est paul, ton voisin a pointe claire!)

Howe about a message to CTI? to either inquire about their opinion as to the condition after a long wait under pressure, or if they can send you a replacement set..

O-rings are pretty standard, size-wise. if you are worried, and have a set of reload instructions handy, you may be able to get a replacement set from McMaster Carr. (or a set for 10 replacements!) Swap them out before our next launch.. (Which will likely be next year [spring / summer] sometime!)
Hi Paul,

I think I'll be OK with this. But Yes, I'll shoot a message off to CTI.

In the meantime, our 5 year old grandson turned up today with a birthday card for me. Since he built and launched his first rocket last month he has become rocket crazy like me!
 

Attachments

  • Matty's Bday card.jpg
    Matty's Bday card.jpg
    80.3 KB · Views: 4
I had a K550 loaded for around 4-5 years before flight. The closures had been backed off a little prior to storage, then nipped up for flight. No problems. Was a little more difficult to light due to the grain having some surface oxidisation.

I would have no hesitation in flying the motor.
 
I have launched motors that were two and three years old.

All I did was check the tightness of the closures, added the deployment charges and flew them like they were stolen.

I still have a few more assembled motors that have not yet flown.
 
Once a seal is established on an o-ring, there’s no reason it should ever unseal, unless you unseal it! You don’t loosen the parts of your car to protect the o-rings, do you?
I think the superstition around o-rings started because once upon a time some o-rings were made of a rubber that was incompatible with oil or grease. They would literally break down. The o-rings in rocket motors are not that material.
 
I had a K550 loaded for around 4-5 years before flight. The closures had been backed off a little prior to storage, then nipped up for flight. No problems. Was a little more difficult to light due to the grain having some surface oxidisation.

I would have no hesitation in flying the motor.
Good point. Surface oxidation or absorption of moisture is more of an issue than o-rings. If a motor has been sitting in a tool box or similar for a long time, a somewhat more energetic starter might be a good idea. In the future, storage in some sort of airtight container is a good idea.

Best -- Terry
 
Good point. Surface oxidation or absorption of moisture is more of an issue than o-rings. If a motor has been sitting in a tool box or similar for a long time, a somewhat more energetic starter might be a good idea. In the future, storage in some sort of airtight container is a good idea.

Best -- Terry
Totally agree!

I drop a small descant in a baggie/plastic bag and tape it tight around the nozzle end. A scrap of paper in there with the motor info doesn't hurt either if it's going to be a long time in storage.

BTW, blue painters tape seems to come off cleaner/better after a long time than other types of tape.
 
Good point. Surface oxidation or absorption of moisture is more of an issue than o-rings. If a motor has been sitting in a tool box or similar for a long time, a somewhat more energetic starter might be a good idea. In the future, storage in some sort of airtight container is a good idea.
I now wrap the motors in food wrap for storage, and use a bit of white lightning grain to augment the igniter.
 
I've had motors built for extended period of time, it should be fine just store it appropriately, you can always take off the aft ring and check.
 
i just tape over the nozzle, and use a sharpie to write down the load. on the tape. I had a cti 75 mm M loaded for almost 4 years, no problems.
 
The concern came about with the older high power RMS reloads that used O-rings that sealed against the forward end of the delay element. The thought was that the delay propellant could acquire a compression set over time and the O-ring would not provide an effective seal. After the “RMS-Plus” design was introduced with the circumferential seal around the plastic delay tube, that issue was eliminated. However, the model rocket-size reloads (18/20, 24/40 etc.) still use the face seal on the delay.

Once a seal is established on an o-ring, there’s no reason it should ever unseal, unless you unseal it! You don’t loosen the parts of your car to protect the o-rings, do you?
I think the superstition around o-rings started because once upon a time some o-rings were made of a rubber that was incompatible with oil or grease. They would literally break down. The o-rings in rocket motors are not that material.
 
The concern came about with the older high power RMS reloads that used O-rings that sealed against the forward end of the delay element. The thought was that the delay propellant could acquire a compression set over time and the O-ring would not provide an effective seal. After the “RMS-Plus” design was introduced with the circumferential seal around the plastic delay tube, that issue was eliminated. However, the model rocket-size reloads (18/20, 24/40 etc.) still use the face seal on the delay.
That’s understandable. Thanks for educating me. Did you ever experience that?
 
How did you remember which reload was in the case ?

Dave F.
Masking tape and sharpie. I always load my motors at home in my garage with good light, no wind, and no dirt. Then I throw a piece of tape on the case and write the load date and reload on the tape.
Usually I fly my motors within a week or two, sometimes it'll be a year.
 
Don't you all forget the 75mm casing o-rin with greased prior to installiation. This grease will greatly help in repelling oxidation. water and other contaminants from degrading the o-ring.I have been a fluid power specialist for more than 30 years and have seen o-rings on systems that run on 5000 psi last for 20 years! Your engine should be fine.
 
I usually wrap the motor face-card around the rocket (and held with an elastic) to know what I have loaded in what rocket when I build mine away from the field (even on the field sometimes!) I'll also scratch on the delay time with a pen..

One habit I hope to star next yer, it to write the motor used & date on a fin after each flight. That way, I now how many times I've flow it, and with what motor (instead of having to record this all on a separate sheet & such). It'll also be a bit of a 'bragging rights' as i walk around with it, at the RSO table, on the pad, etc..
 
It will actually seal better as long as the o-rings were lubed. O-rings absorb the lubricant and swell, making the seal tighter.
 
Back
Top