Nick Hutton
Well-Known Member
I’ve built a Loc High-Tec I got off Big_Red_Daddy on a package and I’m going to make it a dual deploy capable rocket. I’ve built the stock payload section and drilled it for rivets to hold the nose come on the payload section. I’ve also tip to tip glassed the fin can to make it Level 2 capable hopefully.
I’ve cut another section of Loc 2.56 Tube as a longer payload tube to contain a main and put together an AV bay with a switch band. It’s got an egg timer quantum I built on Sunday (shout out to the awesome kits at egg timer - in two weeks I’ve made a quark, an LCD receiver and GPS upgrade and a Tracker as well as the Quantum, and they all work perfectly!).
My question is, do I construct it so that the payload tube is riveted to the nose cone and when fully deployed the AV bay is supended between the two;
Or do I drill the AV bay so that it’s riveted to the payload tube and the nose blows off to release the main?
Any major advantages/disadvantages of either. Just realised I can fit a 1080 Aerotech case in this and put it up on a J570 to hit Mach 1.4. Does standard LOC tubing cope with that?
I’ve cut another section of Loc 2.56 Tube as a longer payload tube to contain a main and put together an AV bay with a switch band. It’s got an egg timer quantum I built on Sunday (shout out to the awesome kits at egg timer - in two weeks I’ve made a quark, an LCD receiver and GPS upgrade and a Tracker as well as the Quantum, and they all work perfectly!).
My question is, do I construct it so that the payload tube is riveted to the nose cone and when fully deployed the AV bay is supended between the two;
Or do I drill the AV bay so that it’s riveted to the payload tube and the nose blows off to release the main?
Any major advantages/disadvantages of either. Just realised I can fit a 1080 Aerotech case in this and put it up on a J570 to hit Mach 1.4. Does standard LOC tubing cope with that?
Attachments
Last edited: