Where to split my dual deploy

Discussion in 'High Power Rocketry (HPR)' started by Nick Hutton, Nov 11, 2019.

Help Support The Rocketry Forum by donating:

  1. Nov 11, 2019 #1

    Nick Hutton

    Nick Hutton

    Nick Hutton

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2019
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    27
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    QLD, Australia
    I’ve built a Loc High-Tec I got off Big_Red_Daddy on a package and I’m going to make it a dual deploy capable rocket. I’ve built the stock payload section and drilled it for rivets to hold the nose come on the payload section. I’ve also tip to tip glassed the fin can to make it Level 2 capable hopefully.

    I’ve cut another section of Loc 2.56 Tube as a longer payload tube to contain a main and put together an AV bay with a switch band. It’s got an egg timer quantum I built on Sunday (shout out to the awesome kits at egg timer - in two weeks I’ve made a quark, an LCD receiver and GPS upgrade and a Tracker as well as the Quantum, and they all work perfectly!).

    My question is, do I construct it so that the payload tube is riveted to the nose cone and when fully deployed the AV bay is supended between the two;

    Or do I drill the AV bay so that it’s riveted to the payload tube and the nose blows off to release the main?

    Any major advantages/disadvantages of either. Just realised I can fit a 1080 Aerotech case in this and put it up on a J570 to hit Mach 1.4. Does standard LOC tubing cope with that?
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Nov 11, 2019
  2. Nov 11, 2019 #2

    timbucktoo

    timbucktoo

    timbucktoo

    Well-Known Member Staff Member Global Mod

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2014
    Messages:
    6,124
    Likes Received:
    570
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cocoa Beach
    I’ve seen it done both ways. Me personally, I prefer to attach rivets to AV bay & pop the NC. That’s probably more common too.
     
    Nick Hutton likes this.
  3. Nov 11, 2019 #3

    Eric

    Eric

    Eric

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2017
    Messages:
    1,102
    Likes Received:
    259
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Vacaville, CA
    I always rivet, screw or friction fit the payload tube to the coupler and blow the nose cone off. Not sure if there is an advantage either way.

    And I have seen LOC tube handle a J825r just fine. I would only worry about strong enough fin connection. LOC tubes are strong.
     
    Nick Hutton likes this.
  4. Nov 11, 2019 #4

    David Schwantz

    David Schwantz

    David Schwantz

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2018
    Messages:
    631
    Likes Received:
    164
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    MN
    I also blow the NC off. Only difference is that I do not use rivets. I use 2-56 steel screws with a ply backer and blind nut in the tube.
     
    Nick Hutton and Eric like this.
  5. Nov 11, 2019 #5

    SammyD

    SammyD

    SammyD

    Forum Supporter TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    775
    Likes Received:
    71
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Wilmington, NC
    I use plastic reusable rivets to secure my payload section to my AV Bay. At apogee, the apogee charge separates the AV Bay, Payload Section, and the Nosecone (as a unit) from the Booster section. They remain tethered together in freefall until the main Parachute is deployed by ejecting the Nosecone at a set altitude near the ground.

    To secure the Nosecone to the Payload section (where the chute is located), I use 2-56 nylon screws. To secure the Payload Section to the AV Bay, I use, as mentioned above, nylon rivets, the type that can be found here:
    https://www.apogeerockets.com/Building_Supplies/Misc_Hardware/Removable_Plastic_Rivets

    2-56 nylon screws can be found here:
    https://www.mcmaster.com/nylon-screws

    NOTE: There is a great deal of information on these forums regarding correct charge sizing and the number of 2-56 screws to use for proper separation of components (find it, read it, understand it, then test it). Ground test everything AS IT WILL FLY (chute packed, shock cord in place, an empty motor casing with proper closures installed, avionics in the AV BAy, etc), and if things separate as they should (just enough to separate them completely but without firing the forward section/nosecone across the yard like a missile), you're ready for flight.
     
  6. Nov 11, 2019 #6

    SammyD

    SammyD

    SammyD

    Forum Supporter TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    775
    Likes Received:
    71
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Wilmington, NC
    Interestingly, your post's title mentioned "where to split your dual-deploy", but I didn't see that asked in the body of your post..................

    FWIW, I try to get the AV Bay as far forward as possible, but still leaving room for the parachute. This accomplishes two things: 1) it pushes CG forward (usually always a good thing), leading to a rocket that's more stable, and 2) it makes more room in the booster section for larger motor casings (more options for motor selection).

    Last, but not least, 2.6" LOC paper might not be the best material to use for flights beyond mach, but you'll have to figure that out by searching the forums and talking to folks more experienced with mach+ flights.
     
  7. Nov 11, 2019 #7

    Nathan

    Nathan

    Nathan

    TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2012
    Messages:
    2,042
    Likes Received:
    284
    The av bay should be bolted or riveted to the payload tube, with the main deployed out the nose. With that configuration:
    1) the main is more likely to be deployed in a direction away from the booster section
    2) the deployment charge will help blow out the chute, instead of just depending on it being pulled out of the payload tube by the harness.
     
  8. Nov 11, 2019 #8

    Zeus-cat

    Zeus-cat

    Zeus-cat

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    4,158
    Likes Received:
    359
    LOC tubing is pretty solid stuff. I haven't hit Mach with any of mine, but I would say fin issues are a more likely problem at those speeds. Structurally, columns are very, very strong. Fin attachment, fin flutter, fin alignment, motor mount, etc. should be more of a concern than the tubes.
     
  9. Nov 11, 2019 #9

    Nick Hutton

    Nick Hutton

    Nick Hutton

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2019
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    27
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    QLD, Australia
    Thanks for replies. Realised I used some incorrect terminology in my original post that may have irked some traditionalists so I’ve tried to fix it a bit.

    I’m fixed on the length of the booster as it’s part of the original kit. I guess I should have specified what arrangement to deploy my main.

    I’ll go with securing the AV bay to the payload bay and use some shear pins on the nose.

    Was clearly planning on ground testing it first. Have already built one dual deploy from SBR, but it came as a kit, so no real choice on setup.
     

Share This Page