Where can I get weight info on Semroc balsa nosecones?

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

Bill S

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2019
Messages
380
Reaction score
112
I'm working up a build, and was wondering if there was a source of weight info for Semroc balsa nosecones? I"m using Rocksim, and entered what info I had, resulting in a weight of 1.61 oz, but I was hoping to have more accurate info before purchasing one.

Neither E-Rocket's website, nor Semroc's website has such info, and it isn't entered into the Rocksim parts database.

Can anyone help?
 

rharshberger

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2014
Messages
9,415
Reaction score
1,481
Location
Pasco, WA
Balsa nosecones are highly variable in weight due to the fact that balsa has a fairly large range of densities (g/cm3), unlike plastic which is very uniform. One source I saw for balsa density gave a range of 40 to 340 kg/m3, with a median density of 160 kg/m3.
 

Bill S

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2019
Messages
380
Reaction score
112
Wow, I had no idea there was such a range of possible densities. I can see where that would complicate things greatly.
 

Bill S

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2019
Messages
380
Reaction score
112
Kuririn, that was really helpful, thanks. :)
 

kitbasher99

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
95
Reaction score
22
Just be aware, as stated above, that the Balsa that we receive to make our nose cones come in in varying densities. Use the weights that you find on the old Semroc sight as a starting point in your simulations. Once you have purchased any or all balsa parts, be they nose cones, transitions, tail cones, or fins, your best bet is to weigh the actual parts you have and input the actual weights into your sims, for the most accurate results.
 

Bill S

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2019
Messages
380
Reaction score
112
Kitbasher99, that is good advice. Thanks.
 

caveduck

semi old rocketeer
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
1,402
Reaction score
131
In my OpenRocket parts database (which now contains all nose cones Semroc ever made) I've normalized the masses to a standard balsa density, and fixed a ton of dimensional errors. The implied densities from the manufacturer quoted weights are all over the place. https://github.com/dbcook/openrocket-database
 

Sheryl@semroc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
123
Reaction score
18
Wow, I had no idea there was such a range of possible densities. I can see where that would complicate things greatly.
We ordered balsa in 2x2 and 4x4 32" long "sticks" for cones. Each one was weighted and we had a certain spread that we used. Some were too light, some too heavy and we had to send them back. The lighter they were, the harder it was to get a smooth finish. We did the same for the balsa and basswood planks. Not sure what procedure Randy uses.
 

Bill S

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2019
Messages
380
Reaction score
112
We ordered balsa in 2x2 and 4x4 32" long "sticks" for cones. Each one was weighted and we had a certain spread that we used. Some were too light, some too heavy and we had to send them back. The lighter they were, the harder it was to get a smooth finish. We did the same for the balsa and basswood planks. Not sure what procedure Randy uses.
That's good to know; at least the density is within a certain range, rather than all over the place. :)
 

caveduck

semi old rocketeer
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
1,402
Reaction score
131
That's certainly true, the "contest balsa" that glider people love is too light to withstand nose cone making, even by hand! If you average the quoted nose cone weights and compute density from the dimensions, you get something around 7lb/ft3 for Estes and Semroc, but I don't have any detailed information about how the manufacturers generated the catalog specs (weighed actual samples seems likely due to scatter in data ??).
 
Last edited:

BEC

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
3,147
Reaction score
265
Location
Auburn, WA
The recent production balsa nose cones I've gotten from eRockets have tended to run towards the light end of the range, with the issues that Sheryl mentioned above. They are certainly usable, but not as smooth as the ones Carl and Sheryl and Bruce made.
 

neil_w

Hunkered down and slowly going crazy
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jul 14, 2015
Messages
9,085
Reaction score
2,410
Location
Northern NJ
I have gotten “rough” balsa cones but don’t really care; they’re all gonna get the same CA/filler treatment and end up glassy smooth. :)
 
Top