Originally posted by sandman
Jim,
So what you are saying is lower pressure at the base causes the higher pressure to force down on the model holding it in place?
In other words...Benoulli sucks!![]()
Sometimes when the answer is simpler it's easier to understand.
Example:
Years ago I taught a Powder Puff auto mechanics course for the local ladies. I was totally frustrated trying to get them to understand the 4 cycle of a 4 cycle motor.
Intake, Compression, Ignition, Exhaust.
It just didn't make sense to them...then it hit me!![]()
Suck, Squeeze, Bang, Blow
The ladies seemed to understand THAT with no trouble at all![]()
To this day...18 years later when ever I see one of the ladies from my old class...they tell me they still remember that!
Originally posted by North Star
I lost my Shadow Composites 'Sprint ABM' to this![]()
It was the first one in Britain (ser # 21) which made it even more annoying.
Originally posted by hokkyokusei
I think we had a nice sunny day _last_ year.
IIRC those pics were taken when we flew the 40th anniversary alphas.
Originally posted by North Star
You're right about the Alphas (wonder what happened to the 'World Tour' ones?) It was 20th July 2000 . What a beautiful evening that was .. and an excellent 'debrief' at "Dick Hudson's" afterwards.
A clothes-pin won't prevent the Krushnic effect, which is a different thing. Bernoulli lock, as previously explained, is when the exhaust from a wide-bodied rocket too close to a flat deflector goes out sideways rapidly, causing a reduction in pressure under the rocket as per the Bernoulli Principle. Yes, Bernoulli sucks.Originally posted by JStarStar
Any rocket i have where the base of the body sits close to the pad, I always use a clothespin to create a prop to raise the rocket up 4" or so to prevent possible Krushnicing.![]()
Originally posted by adrian
The Krushnic effect is when the motor is too far up the body tube, so the body tube itself acts as an expansion chamber. The exhaust fills it, loses pressure, and thus loses thrust. No amount of clothes-pins will help here!
A detailed treatment of the Krushnic effect is given in NAR Technical Review, volume 1, which also explains how vent holes can prevent the effect.
Originally posted by North Star
I did a brief summary of the construction for our webmaster Hokky to put on our site; https://www.northstarrocketry.org.uk/
Look down the left side to 'Projects' and the link leads to the Sprint.
Originally posted by sandman
Jim,
So what you are saying is lower pressure at the base causes the higher pressure to force down on the model holding it in place?
In other words...Benoulli sucks!![]()
Originally posted by adrian
A clothes-pin won't prevent the Krushnic effect, which is a different thing. Bernoulli lock, as previously explained, is when the exhaust from a wide-bodied rocket too close to a flat deflector goes out sideways rapidly, causing a reduction in pressure under the rocket as per the Bernoulli Principle. Yes, Bernoulli sucks.This is where the clothes-pin helps. So does an angled deflector.
The Krushnic effect is when the motor is too far up the body tube, so the body tube itself acts as an expansion chamber. The exhaust fills it, loses pressure, and thus loses thrust. No amount of clothes-pins will help here!
A detailed treatment of the Krushnic effect is given in NAR Technical Review, volume 1, which also explains how vent holes can prevent the effect.