Start updating your resume.
Start updating your resume.
Wow!! Nice collection. Over 50 in these photos alone.This covers almost all of my built rockets. I have one more wall shelf I can put up, which will give me some room to build a few more. My Sirius Saturn V and Apogee Saturn V / 1B and Estes Saturn V are not included, I need to figure out if I want a separate display for space race scale...
View attachment 566100 View attachment 566101
The Pheonix rises. Top tube remade. 29mm motor mount straightened.Ejection charge got knocked off the motor. No deployment. Blunt Instrument is a lot blunter.View attachment 583063
Bring isopropyl alcohol, 91% (or better if you can get it). You can rinse water away water, and then the alcohol evaporates quickly.My new feeling about Bong water landings leans toward challenging myself. How fast I can disassemble, dry out, reassemble and return to service my JLCR and/or tracking tag? And in my case.......I get to test my skills at least once every launch!![]()
It's enough to drive a person toTrying to order over $1500 worth of motors. They are rare down here currently. Website for the supplier has a broken "contact me" link.
Just putting it in perspective, we pay about 2.4 times the $USD cost (including shipping in the USA), but in $AUD. If the exchange rate is miserable there may be another fee on top of that. So a K695 is $403AUD. A pack of D15-7T (3 motors) is $74.40AUD. That is $16USD per D motor reload.
Nope.I would LOVE one of those!
Might be hard finding a lantern battery, though. Might have to also 3D print a case to hold something a bit more modern.
I think you shouldn't bother cutting the 2 mm ones. If you lean toward 3 mm, trust yourself. Taking off 1/3 of the fin mass will be what fraction of the total rocket with motor mass? Not enough to fret about. Just go with 3 mm.Finally, made some progress on my BT-80 F-104... planning for 29mm and will work with 2.6" or BT-80. I am going to cut fins from 2mm and 3mm plywood to see the weight difference. Leaning towards 3mm due to that fragile tail stabilizer.
+1There's one of the master modellers now!
My unsolicited opinion is that it doesn't look right. I'd go with the proper proportions and fix stability with nose weight. It's a sport scale rocket, it doesn't have to be (and won't be) the highest possible performer; it has a worth of its own in what it is.Main body tube is about 5cm too long since I am just mocking up parts but longer tube might be worth it for stability improvement.
Even with tiny fractional-A motors, differential thrust if only one lights could be bad with the tubes that far off center. If you were to do that, it would be worth sacrificing a prototype to the rocket gods to see what happened before selling it as an option with your name and potential liability attached to it.Fuel pods are BT-50 scale and AIM-9 missiles are BT-5. Should I setup the AIM missiles to allow a mini engine in there? Would be cool if you could launch them with electronic ignition after main engines finish lifting main body.
Even with tiny fractional-A motors, differential thrust if only one lights could be bad with the tubes that far off center. If you were to do that, it would be worth sacrificing a prototype to the rocket gods to see what happened before selling it as an option with your name and potential liability attached to it.
My unsolicited opinion is that it doesn't look right. I'd go with the proper proportions and fix stability with nose weight. It's a sport scale rocket, it doesn't have to be (and won't be) the highest possible performer; it has a worth of its own in what it is.
Even with tiny fractional-A motors, differential thrust if only one lights could be bad with the tubes that far off center. If you were to do that, it would be worth sacrificing a prototype to the rocket gods to see what happened before selling it as an option with your name and potential liability attached to it.
Edit to add: I love your Starfighter and really look forward to the BT-80 version. Sadly my finishing skills aren't worthy of this rocket, so I'll have to enjoy it vicariously through others here.
Nothing wrong with that method at all. My go to is CRC electronics cleaner. A blast of compressed air, then a shot of CRC followed by another blast or two of compressed air and it's good to go.Bring isopropyl alcohol, 91% (or better if you can get it). You can rinse water away water, and then the alcohol evaporates quickly.
YES!Would be cool if you could launch them with electronic ignition after main engines finish lifting main body.
View attachment 583689
View attachment 583690 View attachment 583691
Oh, in that case, I'm all for it. Sounds like a glorious idea!Thanks - actually was thinking of the missiles launching off of the F-104 rocket (somewhat like sustainers launching off a booster) -- so potentially even more uncertain and a bit like the Starstreak build.
Am I going to have to dust off my Rossi 15, SuperTigre X- 21 or the K&B21?........Continuing experiments with papering Paulownia fins. I think I'm getting somewhere.
Placed two stock orders on hold when the Aussie peso dropped below $0.65 US.![]()
Just delaying until it creeps up a bit.
Edit: And got inspired by a post in the FB control line group. Cogs be a tickin'.
View attachment 583733
Am I going to have to dust off my Rossi 15, SuperTigre X- 21 or the K&B21?........