Some probably tolerate it better than others. They might even smooth the data to make it more representative of what actually happened. Ravens and Marsas are the only flight computers I’ve mounted like this, so maybe my samples are seriously influencing my opinion.
I’m going to fly an RRC2L in the nose at our October launch. I’ll be interested to see how it looks.
So let me ask this-
why the requirement for “pretty” baro data during the boost?
Other than pouring over data after the flight, why is this important? It’s actually more fun to look at when it’s got some burbles and bobbles so you can try and deduce why.
The rationale was strictly space-savings. I wanted the shortest possible rocket and no airframe tubes. Organizing it in the order I did helped.
and thanks!