Tulanko class HoJo set to fly at Blackrock

Johnly

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
1,063
Reaction score
489
On Behalf Of Kimberly Harms
Tuesday, August 24, 2004 5:51 AM
Project for BlackRock


Hello Rocket Comrades!

There has been some talk about the project that the Community Space Program
is doing for BALLS. I have not commented much because I wanted to hold
comments until I was sure that the project will be done and ready for launch
at that event.

I can now say, unless something unforeseen happens, we will be ready for
BALLS with our project:

It is a FULL SCALE HONEST JOHN

Yes that is correct!

Statistics:

Length: 27 feet 3 inches

Diameter: 24 inches body and 30 includes at the nose bulge

Weight: Our latest estimate of the pad weight is 675 pounds. We have actual
weights on all parts but final weights will be taken after final finish
work.

Propulsion: Four O4800. Each is 38,000 Ns (by static test measurement).
Total Ns in the project is 152,000 (less spin motors). This makes it about
86% Q. Initial thrust of each motor is just over 1000 pounds rising to a
peak of 1250 pounds. Total burn time 7 seconds. Propellant and motor
hardware was made by team members John Lyngdal and Matt Rupert. Thrust
curve:
https://www.hcatech.com/csp/o4800.jpg

Construction of the airframe was made using 24" sono-tube for the main body.
The lower part of the nose below the "bulge" is also the same sono-tube,
just built up on the outside with structure to achieve the conical shape.
The nose part (above the bulge) is built of standard "insulation panel foam"
using a "stacked disk" approach, filled and fiberglassed. A central core in
this part joins it to the "below the bulge" part of the nose. This joint is
fixed and is not intended to separate.

The project separates at a point in the main body section 6' above the fins
(modified Stu Barrett anti-zipper design). Recovery will be a single event
using three 28 foot "man rated" mil surplus C9 chutes. The main section
will descend under 2 and the nose section under the other.

The fins were constructed with approximately the same method used in a
number of our projects. . A root, tip, and spar (a wood - G10 - wood
laminate) forms the basic shape. On to this is built a structure using
rigid closed-cell polyurethane foam shaped to the airfoil needed and covered
with thin plywood. This achieves a "stressed skin" structure similar to an
aircraft wing. We have used this same approach on the fins for our last
years O - N BALLS project, and the XPRS 4 L1120 cluster project and the fins
performed as designed. The fins are, of course, removable and the mounting
system we are using is the same as in the real M31 - a front and rear pin
and a though the wall bolt anchoring the bolt into a constructed "pocket" in
the airframe. The fins are wider at the root that the M31. Since we are not
using metal, we need the extra strength. Each fin weights about 13 pounds.

And YES, there will be eight spin motors and we will be using them. However
we are not canting the fins as in the real M31 so the spin will not be as
pronounced. The real M13 has a 2 rps rate - way faster than we will go. The
airframe separation joint is keyed to hold the parts in alignment with the
anticipated spin.

How high and how fast? I'm not sure I trust any of the simulation programs
with this but we should do around 15k and approach mach.

Since this is an operational flight the full OD green paint job with white
markings is used.


The team members for this project are:

Kimberly Harms
6206, L3, TAP

John Lyngdal
9257, L3, NAR L3CC

Christopher Scott
7903, L3, Prefect TRA Puget Sound, NAR L3CC, NAR Trained Safety Officer

Andy Casillas
6550, L2

Steve Bayer, 1538, L2
Steve Bloom, NAR 71920, L2
Stu Barrett, 1277, L3, TAP
Rick Clapp, 8579, L3
Gwynn Daniels, NAR 71291, L3
Greg Deputy, 2911, L3
Pat Floyd, 5595, L3
Ellen Gonser, 3901, L3
Tom Gonser, 2171, L3
Ed Jacoby, 5876, L3, TAP
Kent Newman, 10097, L3
Matt Rupert, 6607, L2
Traci Scott, NAR 73816, L3
Jim Wilkerson, 2733, L3

At the event just look for the people in the green T-Shirts with dog tags
and it will be one of us!

During the time this project has been in the works I have received email and
calls from many people. Some thought that the project was very cool.
Others were fortunate enough to see a real Honest John launch. And some
remember building the Estes kit and it was their favorite. Estes did
reissue it, so it must have been a favorite for a lot of people.


Enjoy!

John Lyngdal - HoJo Team Member
 
A

Austin

John,

Best wishes to you and your team with the launch of this MegaMonster of a model!!! We look forward to a report and plenty of pics! :)

Good luck bro,

Carl
 

BlueNinja

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
2,701
Reaction score
3
Er... Uh... Wow... I should go to Balls sometime, if this is something like what they normally launch...

Good luck!
 

rstaff3

Oddroc-eteer
Joined
Jan 17, 2009
Messages
11,763
Reaction score
36
May have to spring for an Earl Cagle video or an Extreme Rocketry CD to see this one!
 

slim_t

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2003
Messages
746
Reaction score
0
:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:

Good luck. Wish I could be there. If a dvd becomes available, I will surely get one. This sounds incredible.

Tim
 

Johnly

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
1,063
Reaction score
489
Originally posted by n3tjm
What motors are you using in the spin rockets?

They're 29mm G class motors, using a moonburning propellant geometry.

John
 

LMazza

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2003
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
I'm dreaming!

*Pinch*

No I'm not! Man how I wish I could be out there for that. Best of luck to you and your team. Can't wait to see pictures and videos. :D
 

n3tjm

Papa Elf
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
8,225
Reaction score
1,395
Location
Penns Creek, PA
I am sure the people driving buy turn around to get a second look.... I wonder how many cops know you guys by name already ;)

How do you plan to bring that to the launch? On a flatbed? In a traylor?
 

rdbones

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
1,044
Reaction score
5
I say rent a Military Flat Bed and haul it in !!!!!

It would add to the "atmosphere"

Awesome job as always
 

Johnly

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
1,063
Reaction score
489
On Behalf Of Kimberly Harms


I did what I will consider the final sim. I estimating the pad weight of the project at 736 pounds. 240 of that is motors.

Honest John - Simulation results


Engine selection

[O4700-0 ,O4700-0 ,O4700-0 ,O4700-0 ]


Launch guide data:

Launch guide length: 144.000 In.

Velocity at launch guide departure: 61.577 ft / s

The launch guide was cleared at : 0.576 Seconds

User specified minimum velocity for stable flight: 43.999 ft / s

Minimum velocity for stable flight reached at: 75.785 In.


Max data values:

Maximum acceleration: Vert: 6.007 g ,

Maximum velocity: Vert: 1007.948 ft / s

Maximum altitude: 13460.197 Ft.


Time data:

Time to burnout: 8.611 Sec.

Time to apogee: 29.491 Sec.

Optimal ejection delay: 20.880 Sec.

Enjoy!

T-9 days and counting

John
 

marvSRG

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2011
Messages
900
Reaction score
0
Holy freakin crap! This thing's gonna be incredible!!! What's the propellant in the O motors like?
 

seo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2003
Messages
304
Reaction score
1
One of the O motors evidently cato'd.

Link to picure at Northwest Rocketry website

Cato HJ
 

Elapid

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 2, 2009
Messages
1,735
Reaction score
1
to you guys (the oregon contingent) for your hospitality!
i went to Balls13 by myself, but soon made many new friends. it was cool meeting Scott, Jane, Mike, Pascha, Rob, and i am running out of names... sorry for those i forgot :eek:

angel food cake and ice cream was a bit outside my expectations when i arrived...yummy!

my condolences on your mishap.
:(
 

Chuck Rudy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2009
Messages
829
Reaction score
0
Originally posted by Elapid
but, here's how it looked on the way home..
:(

Post mortems don't get much uglier. If there was a rocketry hall of fame , and if it were reassembled, that would make an impressive static display. A static study to allow for the understanding of the events. Speaking of, why is t here no RHoF? :cool:

Chuck
 
Top