lcorinth
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2014
- Messages
- 1,022
- Reaction score
- 46
I know the question has come up many times "how long should the shock chord be?" And I know the general answer is about (or at least) 3-5 times the length of the rocket, because a longer shock chord will allow the parts to slow down as they separate, lessening the chance of damaging the rocket. I've even heard some people say "as much as you can fit into the rocket."
And I'm sure there's no such thing as a shock chord that's too long. But I'm building a rocket at the moment and about to cut some shock chord, and had a few thoughts, and wanted to ask what you guys think.
Let's say you've got two rockets, both BT-60 (1.637 inch diameter). One has an 18-inch long airframe, and the other has a 36-inch long airframe. Both are meant to fly on D black powder motors.
With a - for simplicity, let's say 3X length - shock chord, the first rocket would need a chord 54 inches long, whereas the second would need one 108 inches long.
But both ejection charges will have roughly the same force. And the nose cone and body tube are only going to fly sideways so far before gravity takes over and they're just going downward. Wouldn't there be some kind of law of diminishing returns to adding length to a shock chord? In other words, if 54 inches long is plenty for the 18-inch rocket, wouldn't it be the same for the 36-inch rocket? Or, at least, wouldn't it make sense to make a 3X chord for the 18-incher, but a 2X (72 inches) chord for the 36-incher? Make the shock chord longer than on the smaller rocket, but not that much longer?
I could see how things might change for high power or dual deployment, where a larger charge would be used for a longer rocket, but I'm not sure it seems that necessary for a LPR rocket. And if you go with a 5X length chord, then for the longer rocket - 15 feet - seems like it might be overkill.
Any thoughts on this subject?
Afterthought: Do people actually mean to go with the longer (say, 5X) for shorter rockets and shorter (3X) for longer rockets with the same power motors?
I'm just curious. I've got plenty of shock chord. I just want to hear people's thoughts and experiences on the matter.
And I'm sure there's no such thing as a shock chord that's too long. But I'm building a rocket at the moment and about to cut some shock chord, and had a few thoughts, and wanted to ask what you guys think.
Let's say you've got two rockets, both BT-60 (1.637 inch diameter). One has an 18-inch long airframe, and the other has a 36-inch long airframe. Both are meant to fly on D black powder motors.
With a - for simplicity, let's say 3X length - shock chord, the first rocket would need a chord 54 inches long, whereas the second would need one 108 inches long.
But both ejection charges will have roughly the same force. And the nose cone and body tube are only going to fly sideways so far before gravity takes over and they're just going downward. Wouldn't there be some kind of law of diminishing returns to adding length to a shock chord? In other words, if 54 inches long is plenty for the 18-inch rocket, wouldn't it be the same for the 36-inch rocket? Or, at least, wouldn't it make sense to make a 3X chord for the 18-incher, but a 2X (72 inches) chord for the 36-incher? Make the shock chord longer than on the smaller rocket, but not that much longer?
I could see how things might change for high power or dual deployment, where a larger charge would be used for a longer rocket, but I'm not sure it seems that necessary for a LPR rocket. And if you go with a 5X length chord, then for the longer rocket - 15 feet - seems like it might be overkill.
Any thoughts on this subject?
Afterthought: Do people actually mean to go with the longer (say, 5X) for shorter rockets and shorter (3X) for longer rockets with the same power motors?
I'm just curious. I've got plenty of shock chord. I just want to hear people's thoughts and experiences on the matter.