Winston
Lorenzo von Matterhorn
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2009
- Messages
- 9,560
- Reaction score
- 1,748
Outstanding, best I've ever seen video about a brilliantly designed aircraft. There are much longer videos about it, but this one covers in detail all of the right points.
However, I strongly disagree with his comment around 13:05 about "low threat levels" being expected in a Cold War Fulda Gap conflict for which the A-10 was designed. He's simply repeating BS claims being made by those who want to shelve the A-10. The Soviets had PLENTY of self-propelled, radar controlled AA guns, SAMs, and man-portable MANPADS to accompany their tanks. That's why, supposedly, all US Fulda Gap wargaming ended up with the use of nukes and, thus, the neutron warhead was developed since, as one US military analyst said at the time, "In Germany, the towns are two kilotons apart." The desire for a chance at a non-nuclear defense is what led to the A-10.
Even with the much greater reluctance to lose aircraft and pilots in this era versus in an all out war with the Soviet Union, the A-10 can still be extremely effective when used for low level close air support, visually verified to avoid friendly fire incidents, in lower threat environments. Just ask US infantry who served in Afghanistan or Iraq.
The Insane Engineering of the A-10 Warthog - Real Engineering
However, I strongly disagree with his comment around 13:05 about "low threat levels" being expected in a Cold War Fulda Gap conflict for which the A-10 was designed. He's simply repeating BS claims being made by those who want to shelve the A-10. The Soviets had PLENTY of self-propelled, radar controlled AA guns, SAMs, and man-portable MANPADS to accompany their tanks. That's why, supposedly, all US Fulda Gap wargaming ended up with the use of nukes and, thus, the neutron warhead was developed since, as one US military analyst said at the time, "In Germany, the towns are two kilotons apart." The desire for a chance at a non-nuclear defense is what led to the A-10.
Even with the much greater reluctance to lose aircraft and pilots in this era versus in an all out war with the Soviet Union, the A-10 can still be extremely effective when used for low level close air support, visually verified to avoid friendly fire incidents, in lower threat environments. Just ask US infantry who served in Afghanistan or Iraq.
The Insane Engineering of the A-10 Warthog - Real Engineering