The DEATH of NARAM ???

Discussion in 'Competition Rocketry' started by Ez2cDave, Nov 7, 2016.

Help Support The Rocketry Forum by donating:

  1. Nov 7, 2016 #1

    Ez2cDave

    Ez2cDave

    Ez2cDave

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    2,278
    Likes Received:
    504
    To All,

    I received this e-mail a few weeks ago . . . ( Sender ID redacted )

    Dave Fitch


    -----Original Message-----
    From: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    To: ez2cdave <ez2cdave@aol.com>
    Sent: Sun, Oct 2, 2016 12:03 pm
    Subject: 2017 Great lakes World Cup

    Dave:

    As you have probably notice, NARAM 59 has yet to be announced.

    The reason is simple--the NARAM has been merged with the 2017 Great Lakes World Cup. That Cup has to be approved at the next meeting of the FAI-CIam meeting in Switzerland set for this month or November. Approval is all but certain at this point.

    Logistics are already underway to fly the FAI officials to Chicago, drive them to the event, house them, and feed them. The fees associated with this effort are similar to those of hosting an internats in the USA. One estimate made a few years back put it at 1.3 million dollars. If you add inflation, the cost is 1.5 million dollars. Who is paying this sum is unclear--I do not think NAR has this on hand. CD will be John Langford

    There was a complaint from CROC that they were not party to the rules making this year. I now know why.

    With the Cup being made a part of NARAM, it would seem that the nationals are a sideshow and may cease to exist in current form. NAARAM would have to be shortened to 3-4 days just to accommodate the Cup if it is not assimilated entirely. The one reason to retain the NARAM is to allow non-FAI flyers some competition of non FAI events.

    Please pass this on to the rest of the rocketry community.


    Thanks,

    XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX.
     
  2. Nov 7, 2016 #2

    KennB

    KennB

    KennB

    I-95 Envoy

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2010
    Messages:
    2,262
    Likes Received:
    84
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Amesbury, MA
    From the NAR site, NARAM-59. Not sure when it was posted, but Mark Twain would likely have a comment.
     
  3. Nov 7, 2016 #3

    scsager

    scsager

    scsager

    Slightly burned-out old guy

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,722
    Likes Received:
    29
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm not worried about NARAM 59, or the financial state of the NAR.

    If you have been reading "The Electronic Rocketeer" (emailed to all NAR members every month) then you already know a little bit about the changes coming for NAR competition rocketry.

    Speculation and rumors are not always helpful or productive :)
     
  4. Nov 7, 2016 #4

    samb

    samb

    samb

    Lifetime Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    Messages:
    3,593
    Likes Received:
    83
    Location:
    Plano, TX
    Exactly right. Competition, at least as envision by Mr. Stine and the first generation NAR folks, has changed (IMHO). Change always brings some amount of pain and pleasure. Your mileage may vary ! :grin:
     
  5. Nov 7, 2016 #5

    caveduck

    caveduck

    caveduck

    semi old rocketeer

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Messages:
    1,188
    Likes Received:
    54
    Here are some numbers for context:

    Circa 1980, NAR membership was hovering right around 2000, with NARAM competitors ~150, around 7.5% of membership. There were dozens of A/B division contestants (non adults). There was neither high power nor sport flying at NARAM. It was already under discussion that competition was declining.

    In the 2015-2016 era, NAR membership has crossed 6000, but LPR competitors at NARAM are down to ~100, or 1.6% of NAR membership. There are only 10-12 A/B division competitors now, with several being from the same handful of families. The apparent size of NARAM has stayed about the same, but now there are many sport/HPR fliers who are not competing. Thus, over the years the fraction of NAR members participating in competition has declined nearly 80%.

    The FAI competition group in the US is catching up to the size of the NARAM group. At the NARAM-57 FAI flyoffs there were nearly 50 competitors, so the Internats group now represents about 1/3 of the total competition pool, not accounting for overlap.
     
  6. Nov 8, 2016 #6

    Kallahan11

    Kallahan11

    Kallahan11

    Forum Supporter TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2016
    Messages:
    305
    Likes Received:
    23
    Well I'm the secretary of SMASH/MMAR the clubs hosting NARAM 59 I can tell you that we were the only club to put in a bid (albeit after NARAM 58, when nobody else wanted too). we've known we were doing NARAM 59 for quite a while (before oct 2nd for sure) so I wouldn't trust your source, they had no real knowledge of what was going on.
     
  7. Nov 8, 2016 #7

    tab28682

    tab28682

    tab28682

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2014
    Messages:
    1,467
    Likes Received:
    0
    Another sensationalized "tempest in a teacup" about NARAM.
     
  8. Nov 8, 2016 #8

    Pat_B

    Pat_B

    Pat_B

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    908
    Likes Received:
    0
    I sponsored the Great Lakes Cup in Illinois for 2-3 years and am certainly not involved in whatever is going on at NARAM. I find it unusual that someone would use my contest name for another event.
     
  9. Nov 9, 2016 #9

    TheAviator

    TheAviator

    TheAviator

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    814
    Likes Received:
    2
    Another bit of misinformation. The cup is the Can-Am Cup.
     
  10. Nov 9, 2016 #10

    Kallahan11

    Kallahan11

    Kallahan11

    Forum Supporter TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2016
    Messages:
    305
    Likes Received:
    23
    Yes the can-am cup is the first few days of naram.
     
  11. Jan 22, 2017 #11

    Ez2cDave

    Ez2cDave

    Ez2cDave

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    2,278
    Likes Received:
    504
    Help make Competition Rocketry great again !!!
     
  12. Jan 22, 2017 #12

    Woody's Workshop

    Woody's Workshop

    Woody's Workshop

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2011
    Messages:
    3,969
    Likes Received:
    68
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Reed City, Michigan (Lower)
    Why are the over night accommodations in Grand Rapids, almost an hours drive away from the launch site?
    Isn't there anything closer?
     
  13. Jan 22, 2017 #13

    Gus

    Gus

    Gus

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    1,668
    Likes Received:
    14
    Believe it or not, Muskegon is a summer destination spot, and hotel and motel prices double on June 15th through the end of summer. Last year we scheduled the CanAm Cup for the end of June and were shocked to discover the group rate at the Muskegon Holiday Inn was over $200 a night. Since it was a small group, we ended up staying at a Rodeway Inn about 20 miles south of the field for $105 a night, and that was after looking at virtually every hotel in the area.

    For NARAM I know Bob A. looked at a ton of places and what is being used is the best he could find that had both adequate conference facilities and an affordable rate.

    If you are not concerned with staying with everyone at the host hotel, you can almost certainly find something about the same price closer to the flying field.

    Steve
     
  14. Jan 22, 2017 #14

    tHoagland

    tHoagland

    tHoagland

    Rocket Builder TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2016
    Messages:
    173
    Likes Received:
    0
    My family used to visit the Muskegon area every summer. The beaches are beautiful, (although the water was always cold). If you like to camp, there are a couple of state parks in the area (Muskegon, JP Hoffmaster, and Grand Haven) which are all pretty nice. The campgrounds full early so, book soon....
     
  15. Jan 23, 2017 #15

    Initiator001

    Initiator001

    Initiator001

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2009
    Messages:
    2,743
    Likes Received:
    44
    I think I can speak for many who attended NARAM-54 by saying that as long as the elevators work all week the drive is no big deal. :wink:
     
  16. Jan 25, 2017 #16

    Kallahan11

    Kallahan11

    Kallahan11

    Forum Supporter TRF Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2016
    Messages:
    305
    Likes Received:
    23
    It's because of the hotel pricing in summer in muskegon. End of July to early August is the best time to visit Lake Michigan (Which I would recommend doing for a day, though Holland state park will be closer and better)
     
  17. Jan 25, 2017 #17

    Woody's Workshop

    Woody's Workshop

    Woody's Workshop

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2011
    Messages:
    3,969
    Likes Received:
    68
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Reed City, Michigan (Lower)
    Still, it's $109 a night.
    Seams high to me.
    I'm only an hour away from Ludington.
    Use to spend a lot of time at the parks there when I was younger.
     
  18. Jan 30, 2017 #18

    James Duffy

    James Duffy

    James Duffy

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2009
    Messages:
    776
    Likes Received:
    76
    Could one of the mods please change the erroneous, misleading, and overly dramatic title of this thread, please?

    Thanks,
    James
     
  19. Jan 31, 2017 #19

    Incongruent

    Incongruent

    Incongruent

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2016
    Messages:
    1,732
    Likes Received:
    2
    When and where is the Tea Cup?
     

Share This Page