# Starter Sets

### Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

#### CTRockets

##### Active Member
I was looking at Starter sets online because I would like to get my nephew into Rocketry. I am torn between The Estes Alpha 3 and Quest Astra 3. He is 10 years old so I was looking at those 2 because they seem pretty simple. Does anyone have any input on which is better? I never actually bought a starter set when I began. I already had a model I had built and a friend of mine gave me an old launch pad and launch controller.

Also, I am a bit perplexed about a starter set I am seeing out there called the Sky Eagle Starter set. Is this a rocket company I have never heard of? Does anyone have any input on that set?

##### Well-Known Member
Sky Eagle is sold in the USA by Apogee (here is the link you forgot to provide): http://www.apogeerockets.com/sky_starter_set.asp

It is a Chinese rocket and a Chinese knock-off of the Estes pad and controller. I've seen them live and in person.

Of the 3 you asked about, the winner by a LONG margin is the Quest set. The controller is far superior. The rocket is far superior. The pad is good. The motors are great and if you get a new set from Quest direct, they will probably include the new Q2G2 igniters which are the best igniter ever made (in my personal opinion).

The Astra is better than the Alpha because it is longer and also uses a Kevlar shock cord anchor. The longer tube actually allows you to install the proper amoount of recovery wadding. The Alpha is too short (in my opinion) and most beginners end up with melted parachutes after one or two flights as it is difficult to install enough wadding AND install the parachute.

#### Gillard

##### Well-Known Member
i'd agree with the above, except, my club lies the alpha as the first rocket up nearly every meeting, its had loads of flights and is still going strong.