Single engine booster as "igniter" for three engine cluster shown in Estes TR-6

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

brockrwood

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jun 9, 2015
Messages
2,858
Reaction score
3,208
Location
Denver, Colorado, USA
Has anyone tried the single engine booster as "igniter" to three engine cluster shown in the 1963 Estes Technical Report, TR-6? It’s pretty wild looking. I did not read the TR when it was published. I was only a few months old at the time. :)

I may try it. Are there any kits or plans using this scheme?

Link to TR-6.

https://plans.rocketshoppe.com/pubs/Estes/estTR-6/1963_Estes_TR-6.pdf
See figure 6 and figure 7.




6CA6F4E8-0060-472B-B4F7-9797F23D2752.png
 

Attachments

  • 3692B1E1-9508-47A3-98CB-8BDD8E70805B.png
    3692B1E1-9508-47A3-98CB-8BDD8E70805B.png
    219 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Igniting three motors with a booster motor seemed to work ok on the Estes #2134 MIRV so I don’t see why this wouldn’t work too. Since I enjoy staging as much as clustering if it were my project I’d just build the “igniter module” as a booster but that’s just me 😉

Nifty idea - if you try it report back on the results…
 
Yeah, that visual would be way cool. You get some smoke and noise on the pad and then the main event.

Thanks for posting this @brockrwood

This would also have potential for delayed staging.
 
Igniting three motors with a booster motor seemed to work ok on the Estes #2134 MIRV so I don’t see why this wouldn’t work too. Since I enjoy staging as much as clustering if it were my project I’d just build the “igniter module” as a booster but that’s just me 😉

Nifty idea - if you try it report back on the results…
Yup, I launched a MIRV at my club a month or so ago. I thought it was very cool. 🙂
Here's a pic of the portion that vents the booster engine ejection to all three sustainer engines
IMG_20220604_115618202_HDR.jpg
 
Note that that old TR has you use a 1/4A booster, probably so it’s not too hard to keep it on the launch rod. Right now the lowest total impulse boosters in production are As (A8-0 and A10-0T). However there are 1/2A3-0Ts and 1/2A6-0s ”out there”.

As others have noted, the MIRV uses this principle but lets the first stage fly. All the MIRV flights I’ve seen have worked well. (I know there’s at least one thread on here griping about how it didn’t work for them….)

Granted, even using an A impulse booster to essentially start a model like the Cobra (in the pictures in the TR) if it were allowed to just fly, it’d stage pretty low. I’d be a little worried about rod speed in that situation, though :eek:.

Note also that that TR has the 1/4A igniting Series II motors. Those old B3s (then, in Metric, B14s) have really big nozzles…..
 
Done times 3
https://www.rocketryforum.com/threads/ho-hum-nuther-3ncb-flight-3-dog-night-post-12.64307/
https://www.rocketryforum.com/threads/successful-launch-and-staging-cerberus-iii.46235/
And the Estes MIRV (great concept, horrible execution, unless until they come up with C5-0 booster)

https://www.rocketryforum.com/threads/estes-mirv-sort-of-a-build-thread.138977/

There was a kit called the MIRV-Gryphon.

It’s a great idea. I recommend going with a really good booster, one motor up (at least) from sustainers, I like the D5-0.

I also like big bore sustainers, not sure if proven, but seems like larger bores have more access to the booster flame. I am partial to the A8 motors (A8-5, but an A8-3 with work in a pinch, especially if you use streamers instead of chutes on sustainers, as they will tolerate and early high speed ejection deployment better than a chute.)
 
Last edited:
I have read of someone igniting zink-sulfer motor using an F100 like a super sqid. I wonder if we could ignite AT motors using an MM motor?
 
I'm wondering if there are any current BP motors that have the approximate nozzle size of the old B-30/B-14
 
Back
Top