Quantcast

Shock cord mounting

The Rocketry Forum

Help Support The Rocketry Forum:

Ccolvin968

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2016
Messages
314
Reaction score
0
I know there are a bunch of different ways to mount it on the motor mounts.
If I want to put it through the centering rings, does it need to be on both sides or can I do it on just one?
It says in the instructions for my rocket that it relies on the motors forward closure retention eye bolt for attachment of the shock cord. Is that only on bigger motors? Anybody have pictures?
Does the way I want o do it work though? Shock cord on one side epoxied to the mmt and the centering rings?
Thank you for your time!
 
Last edited:

Ccolvin968

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2016
Messages
314
Reaction score
0
If I use Cesaroni motors, they don't have a forward closure do they? How exactly would that work?
 

Steve Shannon

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
6,586
Reaction score
3,383
Location
Butte, Montana
I know there are a bunch of different ways to mount it on the motor mounts.
If I want to put it through the centering rings, does it need to be on both sides or can I do it on just one?
It says in the instructions for my rocket that it relies on the motors forward closure retention eye bolt for attachment of the shock cord. Is that only on bigger motors? Anybody have pictures?
Does the way I want o do it work though? Shock cord on one side epoxied to the mmt and the centering rings?
Thank you for your time!
I've mounted many shock cords epoxied along one side of the motor mount. It works just fine.
Smaller CTI motors do not have a forward closure that can accommodate an eye bolt.


Steve Shannon
 

Rex R

LV2
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
6,101
Reaction score
144
if this is for your 4" fg L2 project, you might consider running a Y type mount with Kevlar on opposing sides of the motor mount tube.
Rex

comp3mmt 001.jpg
 

Ccolvin968

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2016
Messages
314
Reaction score
0
Yeah, it's for my L2 build.
I did the Y type mount for my L1 rocket. I just don't like the way it makes the loop.
I have no idea why, but I like the look and how neat one line is rather than two with a knot and a big loop.
If I do only one side, will that be detrimental to my rocket in the long run? Or it it personal preference?
Thanks for all of the suggestions!
Corzero, that's a pretty impressive mmt!
I don't think I'll go that far for L2. :)
 

caveduck

semi old rocketeer
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
1,512
Reaction score
214
The closure eyebolt method is also great for 54mm and up. Cesaroni has an accessory forward closure with eyebolt thread for 54mm, and the 75/98 hardware has eyebolt threads standard. The situation is similar for Aerotech. I kind of like it because it reduces the amount of rigging inside your rocket a fair amount and streamlines construction. Some of the Madcow 79/98 kit instructions are for the eyebolt method. I did it for my L3 and was quite happy.
 

Ccolvin968

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2016
Messages
314
Reaction score
0
I'll take a look.
I'll be flying my 4 inch Tomach on 54 more often than 75 for cost savings.
I'll have to get both if I were to do it that way, but it sounds like it will be worth the extra cash.
 

Ccolvin968

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2016
Messages
314
Reaction score
0
I'll take a look.
I'll be flying my 4 inch Tomach on 54 more often than 75 for cost savings.
I'll have to get both if I were to do it that way, but it sounds like it will be worth the extra cash.
 

Handeman

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
7,766
Reaction score
363
Location
Stafford, VA
As caveduck mentioned, a threaded forward closure is available for CTI 54mm. You didn't mention how heavy your rocket would be, but on those windy days when you want to stay low, a small J or large I in 38mm might be what you want to fly, but that wouldn't be possible with CTI if you go with the threaded forward closure method as your only way to mount your shock cord.

The other thing with using threaded forward closures is, you can't use motor ejection backup to your DD. Some people like that, especially if they are flying single altimeter DD. I've never used the motor backup so I won't say one way or the other but it is another thing to consider.

The forged eyebolt in CORZERO's pics is also something I don't usually do, but it is certainly a viable method. My only suggestion is to fit the eyebolt and CR into the body tube before you epoxy everything. The pics in CORZERO's post look like the eyebolt might not fit inside the BT. Check clearances with shock cord through the eyebolt before permanently installing.

I used the tubular Kevlar epoxied to the MMT method in my L3. I used a piece long enough to be epoxied to both sides of the MMT and the top loop extend about 6" out of the BT. I then fed the loop through and around a 30Kg man-rated ball bearing climbing swivel as my attachment point for the shock cord.

BTW, the swivel pictured in the last pic of CORZERO's post is the type I don't recommend. I used one of those one time and it came back stretched and distorted and not swiveling any longer. I would only recommend true ball bearing swivels. YMMV
 

Buckeye

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Sep 6, 2009
Messages
2,612
Reaction score
464
Smaller CTI motors do not have a forward closure that can accommodate an eye bolt.
Yes, but you can make one for 38mm. I learned this trick from one of Crazy Jim's posts.

Lift the cap and pour out the ejection powder from the well. Carefully thread an eye bolt (3/16", I think) into the touch hole in the bottom of the plastic well. Fill the well with epoxy.
 

K'Tesh

OpenRocket Chuck Norris
TRF Supporter
Joined
Mar 27, 2013
Messages
14,787
Reaction score
1,232
I've aways been a little concerned about kevlar being installed directly in the line of the hot gasses from the ejection. I've read that it can, and does erode over time.

To that, I've seen designs that have the shock cord protrude beyond the aft CR, and then end in a loop that gets wrapped around the motor casing/motor retainer. After a flight, you can pull it back to inspect the cord, then from the front pull it back into position. Why don't more people use this method for rockets that are too tight for an eye bolt or U bolt?

 
Last edited:

qquake2k

Captain Low-N-Slow
Joined
Jan 26, 2010
Messages
13,573
Reaction score
35
I've never used a y-type harness. I always use an eyebolt, eyenut, or u-bolt in my MPR and HPR builds.

hijacker06.jpg


hijacker14.jpg


highjacker_cord3.jpg


271_kevlar.jpg


61_u-bolt.jpg


98_motor_mount.jpg


26_u-bolt.jpg


17_eyebolt.jpg


51_baffle.jpg


151_motor_mount.jpg
 

K'Tesh

OpenRocket Chuck Norris
TRF Supporter
Joined
Mar 27, 2013
Messages
14,787
Reaction score
1,232
I've never used a y-type harness. I always use an eyebolt, eyenut, or u-bolt in my MPR and HPR builds.
And for long body tubes that are hard to reach into, you can use my U-Loop attachment point to allow for inspection...

 

qquake2k

Captain Low-N-Slow
Joined
Jan 26, 2010
Messages
13,573
Reaction score
35
And for long body tubes that are hard to reach into, you can use my U-Loop attachment point to allow for inspection...]
I like that. Are your loops knotted or sewn?
 

MikeyDSlagle

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2013
Messages
2,431
Reaction score
424
If you are not going to be using the motor ejection at all, I see no reason to have kevlar on your MMT. Use it where your harness will connect to the A/V bay. My level 2 build (currently in progress) uses something like K'Tesh's "U Loop" method. Except I sewed a swivel in place of the ring. I have the ring, and want to use the ring, but seems the swivel is a better option.

I have built a few with the kevlar attached directly to the MMT. One side, both sides, wrapped around, whatever suits my fancy at the time. I like the idea of a Y Harness to help distribute the load, but don't believe it is necessary.

But I am far from an expert.
 

Handeman

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
7,766
Reaction score
363
Location
Stafford, VA
All of the removable/replaceable shock cord methods are OK, but I don't use any of them. My experience, and this is just my experience, is with a Public Missiles Callisto. It has a 1" nylon shock cord from the motor mount to the piston. I've been flying it since 2003. I flew it on a cold day a couple years ago and the BT broke in half on landing. That gave me a chance to inspect the shock cord close to the MMT. It was a little melted on the surface, but still strong and solid and I expect it to last another 10 - 12 years. I didn't record how many flights it had the first 5 years, but I would estimate the total flights as of today in the 75 - 100 range.

Because of that experience I use a Kevlar loop epoxied onto the MMTs and skip the added weight of metal parts like eye bolts and u-bolts or the extra complications of removable or replaceable shock cords. I expect the shock cords and mounting to outlast the rocket.

Of course, that's just me, YMMV
 

Buckeye

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Sep 6, 2009
Messages
2,612
Reaction score
464
All of the removable/replaceable shock cord methods are OK, but I don't use any of them. My experience, and this is just my experience, is with a Public Missiles Callisto. It has a 1" nylon shock cord from the motor mount to the piston. I've been flying it since 2003. I flew it on a cold day a couple years ago and the BT broke in half on landing. That gave me a chance to inspect the shock cord close to the MMT. It was a little melted on the surface, but still strong and solid and I expect it to last another 10 - 12 years. I didn't record how many flights it had the first 5 years, but I would estimate the total flights as of today in the 75 - 100 range.

Because of that experience I use a Kevlar loop epoxied onto the MMTs and skip the added weight of metal parts like eye bolts and u-bolts or the extra complications of removable or replaceable shock cords. I expect the shock cords and mounting to outlast the rocket.

Of course, that's just me, YMMV
I agree. A good nylon or Kevlar mount will last longer than the rocket. I also avoid heavy metal links and use good ol' knots to make connections. A bowline is strong and can be undone fairly easily, if needed.

The only cords than burn through for me are Estes rubber bands!
 

Steve Shannon

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
6,586
Reaction score
3,383
Location
Butte, Montana
All of the removable/replaceable shock cord methods are OK, but I don't use any of them. My experience, and this is just my experience, is with a Public Missiles Callisto. It has a 1" nylon shock cord from the motor mount to the piston. I've been flying it since 2003. I flew it on a cold day a couple years ago and the BT broke in half on landing. That gave me a chance to inspect the shock cord close to the MMT. It was a little melted on the surface, but still strong and solid and I expect it to last another 10 - 12 years. I didn't record how many flights it had the first 5 years, but I would estimate the total flights as of today in the 75 - 100 range.

Because of that experience I use a Kevlar loop epoxied onto the MMTs and skip the added weight of metal parts like eye bolts and u-bolts or the extra complications of removable or replaceable shock cords. I expect the shock cords and mounting to outlast the rocket.

Of course, that's just me, YMMV
The black straps that PML uses on the hot gas side of their pistons is not just nylon, but a blend of materials that chars slightly on the outside to protect the strap from melting. I have some that are quite stiff as a result, but continue to serve well and I've never melted one.
The colored strap on the outside of the piston is nylon. I've seen instances where people accidentally swapped the two during construction with a result of melting through the nylon.


Steve Shannon
 

Handeman

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
7,766
Reaction score
363
Location
Stafford, VA
The black straps that PML uses on the hot gas side of their pistons is not just nylon, but a blend of materials that chars slightly on the outside to protect the strap from melting. I have some that are quite stiff as a result, but continue to serve well and I've never melted one.
The colored strap on the outside of the piston is nylon. I've seen instances where people accidentally swapped the two during construction with a result of melting through the nylon.


Steve Shannon
I was not aware there was a difference, I thought it was the size. Do you know what the added material is?
 

Steve Shannon

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
6,586
Reaction score
3,383
Location
Butte, Montana
I was not aware there was a difference, I thought it was the size. Do you know what the added material is?
For some reason polyester and cotton comes to mind, but I could be completely wrong. I'll see if I can find the reference. It might have been in their FAQ.


Steve Shannon
 

Steve Shannon

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
6,586
Reaction score
3,383
Location
Butte, Montana
For some reason polyester and cotton comes to mind, but I could be completely wrong. I'll see if I can find the reference. It might have been in their FAQ.


Steve Shannon
Here it is, although they just say nylon blend:
Piston Strap Heat Resistance/Nomex Protectors
We sometimes get questions about whether the piston strapping needs to be protected from ejection heat. First, the strap is a nylon blend, not pure nylon, so it's relatively resistant to the short-term heat of an ejection charge. Regarding strap protection, PML has sold more than 20,000 kits over the past 10 years. That's probably 100,000 flights assuming only 5 flights per kit (which is probably substantially too low, but for the sake of argument that's what we'll use). We've only had two piston straps returned because of burn-through damage. That's a 0.00002% failure of piston straps due to heat damage. Clearly, customer experience has shown there’s no need to add piston strap protection; it only adds unnecessary weight and cost.


Steve Shannon
 

byoungblood

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2014
Messages
247
Reaction score
4
I have run a bit of heat shrink tube over the 6-8" of Kevlar closest to the MMT on my past couple of builds to help protect it from the ejection gasses.

I like the idea of running the shock cord all the way out the end of the rocket. My only thought is that you'd have to have some kind of tube to run it through to facilitate easy reinstallation, which in turn would give ejection gasses a place to escape. Perhaps a small dab of RTV where the cord comes out on the aft end will seal things up since it isn't likely that you'll pull it out after every flight.
 

Nytrunner

Pop lugs, not drugs
TRF Supporter
Joined
Oct 15, 2016
Messages
7,751
Reaction score
3,378
Location
Huntsville AL
I've had success wrapping the first couple feet of my nylon or elastic lines in ductape. Inexpensive, easily replaceable, and no noticeable adverse side effects yet.

The brief instant of high temperature from the charge just doesn't hang around long enough to degrade the tape.
 

Handeman

Well-Known Member
TRF Supporter
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
7,766
Reaction score
363
Location
Stafford, VA
+1 on the duct tape. I've been using this too. I have a Kevlar cord protector, but it's not big enough to fit over the knot at the end of the cord. I tape the exposed part of the cord with tape and add a little more every year or two.
 
Top